Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29193688›Full record

ReviewThoracic cancer2018

Value of ablation therapy in the treatment of lung metastases.

Han Qi, Weijun Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Tumor-Specific CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Local treatment of oligometastatic disease: current role.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Han QiMinimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Weijun FanMinimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7096-7493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor metastases are the basic biological characteristics of malignant tumors, and the lungs are the second most prominent metastatic organs in which these develop after the liver. Currently, with the rapid development of ablation technology, ablation therapy as a local treatment is playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of lung metastases. Whether alone or in combination with other treatments, ablation therapy has achieved good therapeutic effects for the treatment of partial lung metastases. This article briefly summarizes the results of current and previous ablation treatments for lung metastases, and focuses on the value of ablation therapy for different kinds of lung metastases.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisSarcomaTreatment OutcomeAblation therapybone and soft tissue sarcomacolorectal cancerlung metastasesrenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID29193688
PMCPMC5792733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.