Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29193647›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2018

The incidence, characteristics, management and outcomes of anaphylaxis in pregnancy: a population-based descriptive study.

S J McCall, K J Bunch, P Brocklehurst, R D'Arcy, K Hinshaw, J J Kurinczuk, D N Lucas, B Stenson, D J Tuffnell, M Knight

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anaphylaxis and pregnancy: Epidemiology, elicitors, and recurrences.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Vancomycin during delivery hospitalizations for women with group B streptococcus.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Maternal critical care: part I.BJA education · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. To screen or not to screen women for Group B Streptococcus (Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

S J McCallPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
K J BunchPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
P BrocklehurstPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
R D'ArcyNuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
K HinshawDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
J J KurinczukPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
D N LucasDepartment of Anaesthetics, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK.
B StensonNeonatal Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
D J TuffnellTeaching Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Bradford, UK.
M KnightPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNorthwick Park Hospital · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0608-10038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of anaphylaxis in pregnancy and describe the management and outcomes in the UK.

designA population-based descriptive study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).

settingAll consultant-led maternity units in the UK. POPULATION: All pregnant women who had anaphylaxis between 1 October 2012 and 30 September 2015. Anaphylaxis was defined as a severe, life-threatening generalised or systemic hypersensitivity reaction.

methodsProspective case notification using UKOSS.

main outcome measuresMaternal mortality, severe maternal morbidity, neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity.

resultsThere were 37 confirmed cases of anaphylaxis in pregnancy, giving an estimated incidence of 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1-2.2) per 100 000 maternities. Four cases of anaphylaxis were in women with known penicillin allergies: two received co-amoxiclav and two cephalosporins. Twelve women had anaphylaxis following prophylactic use of antibiotics at the time of a caesarean delivery. Prophylactic use of antibiotics for Group B streptococcal infection accounted for anaphylaxis in one woman. Two women died (5%), 14 (38%) women were admitted to intensive care and seven women (19%) had one or more additional severe maternal morbidities, which included three haemorrhagic events, two cardiac arrests, one thrombotic event and one pneumonia. No infants died; however, in those infants whose mother had anaphylaxis before delivery (n = 18) there were seven (41%) neonatal intensive care unit admissions, three preterm births and one baby was cooled for neonatal encephalopathy.

conclusionsAnaphylaxis is a rare severe complication of pregnancy and frequently the result of a reaction to antibiotic administration. This study highlights the seriousness of the outcomes of this condition for the mother. The low incidence is reassuring given the large proportion of the pregnant population that receive prophylactic antibiotics during delivery. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Anaphylaxis is a rare severe complication of pregnancy and frequently the result of a reaction to antibiotic administration.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAdultAnaphylaxisFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityPerinatal MortalityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesUnited KingdomYoung AdultAnaphylaxis in pregnancycausal agentsmanagementoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID29193647
PMCPMC6033185
OpenAlexW2769868523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.