Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29193607›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

Comparative genomics reveals that loss of lunatic fringe (LFNG) promotes melanoma metastasis.

Martin Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera, Louise van der Weyden, Jeremie Nsengimana, Anneliese O Speak, Marcela K Sjöberg, David Timothy Bishop, Göran Jönsson, Julia Newton-Bishop, David J Adams

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Significant Roles of NotchMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Genetics of metastasis: melanoma and other cancers.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2018
    Review
  14. Congenital diseases caused by defectiveNagoya journal of medical science · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin Del Castillo Velasco-HerreraExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Louise van der WeydenExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Jeremie NsengimanaLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, UK.
Anneliese O SpeakExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Marcela K SjöbergExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
David Timothy BishopLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, UK.
Göran JönssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
Julia Newton-BishopLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, UK.
David J AdamsExperimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10589Cancer Research UK 11963Cancer Research UK 13031Cancer Research UK 19167Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis is the leading cause of death in patients with advanced melanoma, yet the somatic alterations that aid tumour cell dissemination and colonisation are poorly understood. Here, we deploy comparative genomics to identify and validate clinically relevant drivers of melanoma metastasis. To do this, we identified a set of 976 genes whose expression level was associated with a poor outcome in patients from two large melanoma cohorts. Next, we characterised the genomes and transcriptomes of mouse melanoma cell lines defined as weakly metastatic, and their highly metastatic derivatives. By comparing expression data between species, we identified lunatic fringe (LFNG), among 28 genes whose expression level is predictive of poor prognosis and whose altered expression is associated with a prometastatic phenotype in mouse melanoma cells. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of Lfng dramatically enhanced the capability of weakly metastatic melanoma cells to metastasise in vivo, a phenotype that could be rescued with the Lfng cDNA. Notably, genomic alterations disrupting LFNG are found exclusively in human metastatic melanomas sequenced as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas. Using comparative genomics, we show that LFNG expression plays a functional role in regulating melanoma metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesGenomicsGlycosyltransferasesHumansLung NeoplasmsMelanomaMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasm MetastasisSkin NeoplasmsTranscriptomeGlycosyltransferasesLFNG protein, humanLfng protein, mousecomparative genomicsCRISPRmelanomaRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID29193607
PMCPMC5792739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.