ReviewNMR in biomedicine2018
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance elastography: A review.
Review in NMR in biomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reproducibility of 3.0 T single-frequency cardiac MR elastography for quantification of left ventricular myocardial stiffness.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- Advances in Non-Invasive Myocardial Stiffness Assessment and Clinical Applications in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Time-resolved mapping of myocardial stiffness using 2D multifrequency spiral MR elastography with and without external vibration.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Estimation of Active Tension in Cardiac Microtissues by Solving a PDE-Constrained Optimization Problem.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Feasibility of measuring magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness in human thoracic aorta and aortic dissection phantoms.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- In Vivo Quantification of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stretch Using MRI: Relationship to Repair Threshold Diameter and Ex Vivo Wall Failure Behavior.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- Next-Generation Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques for Characterization of Myocardial Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Simultaneous proton resonance frequency TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Cine MR feature tracking analysis for diagnosing thymic epithelial tumors: a feasibility study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023Article
- Asynchronous magnetic resonance elastography: Shear wave speed reconstruction using noise correlation of incoherent waves.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Biomedical Imaging in Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Disease.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Multimodality Imaging in Cardiomyopathies with Hypertrophic Phenotypes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Free-breathing MR elastography of the lungs: An in vivo study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Preliminary Findings on the Potential Use of Magnetic Resonance Elastography to Diagnose Lacunar Infarction.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
- A guide for assessment of myocardial stiffness in health and disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Passive myocardial mechanical properties: meaning, measurement, models.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- The time has come to extend the expiration limit of cryopreserved allograft heart valves.Cell and tissue banking · 2021Review
- Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. These cardiovascular diseases are associated with mechanical changes in the myocardium and aorta. It is known that stiffness is altered in many diseases, including the spectrum of ischemia, diastolic dysfunction, hypertension and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In addition, the stiffness of the aortic wall is altered in multiple diseases, including hypertension, coronary artery disease and aortic aneurysm formation. For example, in diastolic dysfunction in which the ejection fraction is preserved, stiffness can potentially be an important biomarker. Similarly, in aortic aneurysms, stiffness can provide valuable information with regard to rupture potential. A number of studies have addressed invasive and non-invasive approaches to test and measure the mechanical properties of the myocardium and aorta. One of the non-invasive approaches is magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). MRE is a phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging technique that measures tissue stiffness non-invasively. This review article highlights the technical details and application of MRE in the quantification of myocardial and aortic stiffness in different disease states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.