Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29193189›Full record

ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2018

Chemical characterization of 21 species of marine macroalgae common in Norwegian waters: benefits of and limitations to their potential use in food and feed.

Irene Biancarosa, Ikram Belghit, Christian G Bruckner, Nina S Liland, Rune Waagbø, Heidi Amlund, Svenja Heesch, Erik-Jan Lock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application of the brown macroalgaAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. In Vitro Evaluation of Brown SeaweedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Irene BiancarosaNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway.
Ikram BelghitNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1024-3367
Christian G BrucknerNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Bodø, Norway.
Nina S LilandNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway.
Rune WaagbøNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway.
Heidi AmlundNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway.
Svenja HeeschIrish Seaweed Research Group, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Erik-Jan LockNational Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway.
National Institute of Nutrition · INUniversity of Bergen · NONorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NOOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past few years, much effort has been invested into developing a new blue economy based on harvesting, cultivating and processing marine macroalgae in Norway. Macroalgae have high potential for a wide range of applications, e.g. as source of pharmaceuticals, production of biofuels or as food and feed. However, data on the chemical composition of macroalgae from Norwegian waters are scant. This study was designed to characterize the chemical composition of 21 algal species. Both macro- and micronutrients were analysed. Concentrations of heavy metals and the metalloid arsenic in the algae were also quantified.

resultsThe results confirm that marine macroalgae contain nutrients which are relevant for both human and animal nutrition, the concentrations whereof are highly dependent on species. Although heavy metals and arsenic were detected in the algae studied, concentrations were mostly below maximum allowed levels set by food and feed legislation in the EU.

conclusionThis study provides chemical data on a wide range of algal species covering the three taxonomic groups (brown, red and green algae) and discusses both benefits of and potential limitations to their use for food and feed purposes. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFood AnalysisMetals, HeavyNorwayNutritive ValueSeaweedMetals, Heavyarsenicheavy metalsNorwaynutrientsseaweeds

Identifiers

PMID29193189
PMCPMC5888138
OpenAlexW2770402517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.