Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29192968›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2018

A regression framework for assessing covariate effects on the reproducibility of high-throughput experiments.

Qunhua Li, Feipeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qunhua LiDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-0675-7648
Feipeng ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, U.S.A.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
PENN STATE CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033184 · NCRR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2011 to 2011
$4.5M
Statistical methods for improving reproducibility and utility of sequencing dataR01GM109453 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LI, QUNHUA · 2013 to 2022
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033184NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcome of high-throughput biological experiments is affected by many operational factors in the experimental and data-analytical procedures. Understanding how these factors affect the reproducibility of the outcome is critical for establishing workflows that produce replicable discoveries. In this article, we propose a regression framework, based on a novel cumulative link model, to assess the covariate effects of operational factors on the reproducibility of findings from high-throughput experiments. In contrast to existing graphical approaches, our method allows one to succinctly characterize the simultaneous and independent effects of covariates on reproducibility and to compare reproducibility while controlling for potential confounding variables. We also establish a connection between our model and certain Archimedean copula models. This connection not only offers our regression framework an interpretation in copula models, but also provides guidance on choosing the functional forms of the regression. Furthermore, it also opens a new way to interpret and utilize these copulas in the context of reproducibility. Using simulations, we show that our method produces calibrated type I error and is more powerful in detecting difference in reproducibility than existing measures of agreement. We illustrate the usefulness of our method using a ChIP-seq study and a microarray study.

Indexed as

Confounding Factors, EpidemiologicRegression AnalysisAlgorithmsBinding SitesCalibrationCCCTC-Binding FactorComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMicroarray AnalysisModels, StatisticalReproducibility of ResultsCCCTC-Binding FactorCTCF protein, humanCopulaCorrespondence curve regressionCumulative link modelGenomicsHigh-throughput experimentReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID29192968
PMCPMC5975112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.