ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018
Development of a novel histologic diagnostic algorithm for hepatic graft-versus-host disease.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of liver biopsy in the management of idiosyncratic DILI.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Post-allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Portal Hypertension Not Associated with Liver Cirrhosis, Veno-occlusive Disease, or Graft-versus-host Disease.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Drug-induced Liver Injury: The Hepatic Pathologist's Approach.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The histopathologic diagnosis of hepatic graft-versus-host disease post bone marrow and stem cell transplantation can be challenging, but timely and unambiguous diagnosis is essential for appropriate patient management. To address this diagnostic dilemma, we identified histologic features specific for hepatic graft-versus-host disease and developed a diagnostic algorithm. Two hepatopathologists blindly evaluated 40 liver biopsies from patients with clinically and biologically confirmed graft-versus-host disease, as well as 44 controls, for percent bile duct loss, bile duct damage, intraepithelial lymphocytes, ductular reaction, acidophilic bodies/10 high power fields (HPF), cholestasis, portal and lobular inflammation, and endotheliitis. Compared with controls, graft-versus-host disease cases had significantly more bile duct loss (P<0.0001), bile duct damage (P=0.0002), cholestasis (P<0.0001), and acidophilic bodies/10 HPF (P=0.0006), as well as significantly less ductular reaction (P<0.0001). Significance was maintained with a drug-induced liver injury-only control group. No histologic differences were noted in acute versus chronic graft-versus-host disease, nor cholestatic versus hepatitic types. An algorithm to predict likelihood of graft-versus-host disease was developed, with a three-tiered scoring system: 1-2 not, 3-4 probable, and 5-8 unequivocal graft-versus-host disease. This algorithm had a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 93%, and accuracy of 92%. We identified histologic features with specificity for hepatic graft-versus-host disease and developed a simple algorithm for pathologists to predict its likelihood, distinguishing this critical diagnosis promptly from mimickers having vastly different treatments and prognoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29192646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.