Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29192364›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Liver metastases from prostate cancer at 11C-Choline PET/CT: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.

Pietro Ghedini, I Bossert, L Zanoni, F Ceci, T Graziani, P Castellucci, V Ambrosini, F Massari, E Nobili, B Melotti and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cavernous Hepatic Hemangioma at 18F-Choline Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography: Be Aware of the Pitfall.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pietro GhediniNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. pietro.ghedini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8590-277X
I BossertNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
L ZanoniNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
F CeciNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
T GrazianiNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
P CastellucciNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
V AmbrosiniNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
F MassariOncology Department, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
E NobiliOncology Department, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
B MelottiOncology Department, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
A MustoNuclear Medicine Department, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
S ZoboliNuclear Medicine Department, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
L AntunovicNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
M KirienkoNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
A ChitiNuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
C MosconiRadiology, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
A ArdizzoniOncology Department, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
R GolfieriRadiology, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
S FantiNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
C NanniNuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDuring our daily clinical practice using 11C-Choline PET/CT for restaging patients affected by relapsing prostate cancer (rPCa) we noticed an unusual but significant occurrence of hypodense hepatic lesions with a different tracer uptake. Thus, we decided to evaluate the possible correlation between rPCa and these lesions as possible hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 542 patients diagnosed with rPCa in biochemical relapse after a radical treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy). Among these, patients with a second tumor or other benign hepatic diseases were excluded. All patients underwent 11C-Choline PET/CT during the standard restaging workup of their disease. We analyzed CT images to evaluate the presence of hypodense lesions and PET images to identify the relative tracer uptake. In accordance to the subsequent oncological history, five clinical scenarios were recognized [Table 1]: normal low dose CT (ldCT) and normal tracer distribution (Group A); evidence of previously unknown hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT with normal rim uptake (Group B); evidence of previously known hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT stable over time and with normal rim uptake (Group C); evidence of previously known hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT, in a previous PET/CT scan, with or without rim uptake and significantly changing over time in terms of size and/or uptake (Group D); evidence of hepatic round hypodense areas at ldCT with or without rim uptake confirmed as prostate liver metastases by histopathology, triple phase ceCT, ce-ultra sound (CEUS) and clinical/biochemical evaluation (Group E). We evaluated the correlation with PSA level at time of scan, rim SUVmax and association with local relapse or non-hepatic metastases (lymph nodes, bone, other parenchyma).

resultsFive hundred and forty-two consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled. In 140 of the 542 patients more than one 11C-choline PET/CT had been performed. A total of 742 11C-Choline PET/CT scans were analyzed. Of the 542 patients enrolled, 456 (84.1%) had a normal appearance of the liver both at ldCT and PET (Group A). 19/542 (3,5%) belonged to Group B, 13/542 (2.4%) to Group C, 37/542 (6.8%) to Group D and 18/542 (3.3%) to Group E. Mean SUVmax of the rim was: 4.5 for Group B; 4.2 for Group C; 4.8 for Group D; 5.9 for Group E. Mean PSA level was 5.27 for Group A, 7.9 for Group B, 10.04 for Group C, 10.01 for Group D, 9.36 for Group E. Presence of positive findings at 11C-Choline PET/CT in any further anatomical area (local relapse, lymph node, bone, other extra hepatic sites) correlated with an higher PSA (p = 0.0285). In both the univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses. PSA, SUVmax of the rim, local relapse, positive nodes were not associated to liver mets (Groups D-E) (p > 0.05). On the contrary, a significant correlation was found between the presence of liver metG (group D-E) and bone lesions (p= 0.00193).

conclusionOur results indicate that liver metastases in relapsing prostate cancer may occur frequently. The real incidence evaluation needs more investigations. In this case and despite technical limitations, Choline PET/CT shows alterations of tracer distribution within the liver that could eventually be mistaken for simple cysts but can be suspected when associated to high trigger PSA, concomitant bone lesions or modification over time. In this clinical setting an accurate analysis of liver tracer distribution (increased or decreased uptake) by the nuclear medicine physician is, therefore, mandatory.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overCarbon RadioisotopesCholineHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarbon-11Carbon RadioisotopesCholineProstate-Specific Antigen11C-Choline PET/CTLiver secondary lesionsProstate cancerVisceral metastases

Identifiers

PMID29192364
OpenAlexW2775097761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.