ReviewProtoplasma2018
Cytomixis in plants: facts and doubts.
Review in Protoplasma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid chromosome movements persist within nuclear protrusions in Arabidopsis thaliana meiocytes.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- The invisible cytomixis: how a cytological phenomenon can be misinterpreted or totally overlooked.Planta · 2025Review
- Cryoimmobilized anther analysis reveals new ultrastructural insights intoFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Unusual nuclear structures in male meiocytes of wild-type rye as revealed by volume microscopy.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Asynapsis and meiotic restitution in tomato male meiosis induced by heat stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Intercellular nuclear migration in cryofixed tobacco male meiocytes.Protoplasma · 2022Article
- Methomyl, imbraclaobrid and clethodim induced cytomixis and syncytes behaviors in PMCs ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- The Nuclear 35S rDNA World in Plant Systematics and Evolution: A Primer of Cautions and Common Misconceptions in Cytogenetic Studies.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy Reveals That Intercellular Nuclear Migration Occurs in Most Normal Tobacco Male Meiocytes.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- In Support of Winge's Theory of "Hybridization Followed by Chromosome Doubling".Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Hazelnut Pollen Phenotyping Using Label-Free Impedance Flow Cytometry.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Variation in genome size, cell and nucleus volume, chromosome number and rDNA loci among duckweeds.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Tackling Plant Meiosis: From Model Research to Crop Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The migration of nuclei between plant cells (cytomixis) is a mysterious cellular phenomenon frequently observable in the male meiosis of higher plants. Cytomixis attracts attention because of unknown cellular mechanisms underlying migration of nuclei and its potential evolutionary significance, since the genetic material is transferred between the cells that form pollen. Although cytomixis was discovered over a century ago, the advance in our understanding of this process has been rather insignificant because of methodological difficulties. The data that allowed for a new insight into this phenomenon were obtained by examining the migrating nuclei with electron and confocal laser microscopy, immunostaining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. As has been shown, the chromatin migrating between cells is surrounded by an undamaged nuclear membrane. Such chromatin does not undergo heterochromatization and contains normal euchromatin markers. The condensation degree of the migrating chromatin corresponds to the current meiotic stage, and normal structures of synaptonemal complex are present in the migrating part of the nucleus. The cells involved in cytomixis lack any detectable morphological and molecular markers of programmed cell death. It has been shown that individual chromosomes and genomes (in the case of allopolyploids) have no predisposition to the migration between cells, i.e., parts of the nucleus are involved in cytomixis in a random manner. However, the fate of migrating chromatin after it has entered the recipient cell is still vague. A huge amount of indirect data suggests that migrating chromatin is incorporated into the nucleus of the recipient cell; nonetheless, the corresponding direct evidences are still absent. No specific markers of cytomictic chromatin have been yet discovered. Thus, the causes and consequences of cytomixis are still disputable. This review briefs the recent data on the relevant issues, describes the classical and modern methodological approaches to analysis of the intercellular migration of nuclei, and discusses the problems in cytomixis research and its prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.