Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2017
The Influence of Target and Masker Characteristics on Infants' and Adults' Detection of Speech.
Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infants and Adults Use Visual Cues to Improve Detection and Discrimination of Speech in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Trial
- Mask wearing in Japanese and French nursery schools: The perceived impact of masks on communication.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- [Effects of background noise on auditory response characteristics of primary auditory cortex neurons in awake mice].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Several investigators have compared infants' detection of speech in speech and nonspeech maskers to evaluate developmental differences in masking. Such comparisons have produced contradictory results, possibly because each investigation used different stimuli. The current study examined target and masker effects on infants' and adults' detection of speech. Method: An observer-based procedure was used to compare infants' and adults' detection of the vowel /ʌ/ and the word "baby" in a 2-talker speech masker and matched speech-spectrum noise. The measure of performance was d'. A total of 43 7-month-old infants and 41 young adults were randomly assigned to 1 target-masker combination condition, and mean performance was compared across conditions at each age. Results: Adults' detection was influenced by an interaction between the target and the masker: Adults detected the vowel better in the 2-talker masker than in speech-spectrum noise but detected the word equally well in the 2 maskers. In contrast, infants detected both targets better in speech-spectrum noise than in the 2-talker masker. Conclusions: The relative effects of the masker on target detection by infants and adults depend on the target to be detected. Thus, conclusions drawn about differences between infants and adults in the mechanisms responsible for masking will depend on the stimuli. Standardization of speech stimuli in developmental research would help clarify the nature of infants' segregation difficulties. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5613139.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.