Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29192278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Profiling of different pancreatic cancer cells used as models for metastatic behaviour shows large variation in their N-glycosylation.

Stephanie Holst, Ana I Belo, Elisa Giovannetti, Irma van Die, Manfred Wuhrer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolomics andCommunications biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Mass spectrometry analysis of intact proteinJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. High sensitivity glycomics in biomedicine.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Altered glycosylation in pancreatic cancer and beyond.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. IntegratedCells · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie HolstCenter for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. s.holst@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5303-0428
Ana I BeloDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisa GiovannettiDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irma van DieDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manfred WuhrerCenter for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-4995
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterise pancreatic cancer cells from different sources which are used as model systems to study the metastatic behaviour in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), we compared the N-glycan imprint of four PDAC cells which were previously shown to differ in their galectin-4 expression and metastatic potential in vivo. Next to the sister cell lines Pa-Tu-8988S and Pa-Tu-8988T, which were isolated from the same liver metastasis of a PDAC, this included two primary PDAC cell cultures, PDAC1 and PDAC2. Additionally, we extended the N-glycan profiling to a normal, immortalized pancreatic duct cell line. Our results revealed major differences in the N-glycosylation of the different PDAC cells as well as compared to the control cell line, suggesting changes of the N-glycosylation in PDAC. The N-glycan profiles of the PDAC cells, however, differed vastly as well and demonstrate the diversity of PDAC model systems, which ultimately affects the interpretation of functional studies. The results from this study form the basis for further biological evaluation of the role of protein glycosylation in PDAC and highlight that conclusions from one cell line cannot be generalised, but should be regarded in the context of the corresponding phenotype.

Indexed as

MetabolomeMetabolomicsAnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorGlycoproteinsGlycosylationHumansMicePancreatic NeoplasmsPolysaccharidesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationGlycoproteinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID29192278
PMCPMC5709460
OpenAlexW2768331670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.