Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29192192›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Fruit fracture biomechanics and the release of Lepidium didymum pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy by fungi.

Katja Sperber, Tina Steinbrecher, Kai Graeber, Gwydion Scherer, Simon Clausing, Nils Wiegand, James E Hourston, Rainer Kurre, Gerhard Leubner-Metzger, Klaus Mummenhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional packaging of seeds.The New phytologist · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PhytoKeys · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katja SperberDepartment of Biology, Botany, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4121-0026
Tina SteinbrecherSchool of Biological Sciences, Plant Molecular Science and Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-6029
Kai GraeberSchool of Biological Sciences, Plant Molecular Science and Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Gwydion SchererDepartment of Biology, Botany, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-5726
Simon ClausingDepartment of Biology, Botany, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.
Nils WiegandDepartment of Biology, Botany, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.
James E HourstonSchool of Biological Sciences, Plant Molecular Science and Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-8673
Rainer KurreDepartment of Biology, Center for Advanced Light Microscopy, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany.
Gerhard Leubner-MetzgerSchool of Biological Sciences, Plant Molecular Science and Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. Gerhard.Leubner@rhul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-8713
Klaus MummenhoffDepartment of Biology, Botany, University of Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, D-49076, Osnabrück, Germany. Klaus.Mummenhoff@Biologie.Uni-Osnabrueck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8449-1593

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M000583/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biomechanical and ecophysiological properties of plant seed/fruit structures are fundamental to survival in distinct environments. Dispersal of fruits with hard pericarps (fruit coats) encasing seeds has evolved many times independently within taxa that have seed dispersal as their default strategy. The mechanisms by which the constraint of a hard pericarp determines germination timing in response to the environment are currently unknown. Here, we show that the hard pericarp of Lepidium didymum controls germination solely by a biomechanical mechanism. Mechanical dormancy is conferred by preventing full phase-II water uptake of the encased non-dormant seed. The lignified endocarp has biomechanically and morphologically distinct regions that serve as predetermined breaking zones. This pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy is released by the activity of common fungi, which weaken these zones by degrading non-lignified pericarp cells. We propose that the hard pericarp with this biomechanical mechanism contributed to the global distribution of this species in distinct environments.

Indexed as

AscomycotaBiomechanical PhenomenaCladosporiumDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFruitFungiGerminationLepidiumMyceliumPlant DormancySeed DispersalSeedsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID29192192
PMCPMC5709442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.