ArticleScientific reports2017
Monkeys share the neurophysiological basis for encoding sound periodicities captured by the frequency-following response with humans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manifolds in the Medial Premotor Cortex During Switching From Attending to Tapping to a Metronome.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Manifold properties in the macaque medial premotor cortex during switching from attending to tapping to a metronome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Pre-supplementary Motor Cortex Mediates Learning Transfer from Perceptual to Motor Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Diverse Time Encoding Strategies Within the Medial Premotor Areas of the Primate.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Comparison of non-invasive, scalp-recorded auditory steady-state responses in humans, rhesus monkeys, and common marmosets.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A Linear Superposition Model of Envelope and Frequency Following Responses May Help Identify Generators Based on Latency.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- Auditory neurophysiology reveals central nervous system dysfunction in HIV-infected individuals.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Bats distress vocalizations carry fast amplitude modulations that could represent an acoustic correlate of roughness.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.Nature communications · 2019Review
- Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.Hearing research · 2019Review
- Rhythm in speech and animal vocalizations: a cross-species perspective.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019Review
- The amplitude in periodic neural state trajectories underlies the tempo of rhythmic tapping.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extraction and encoding of acoustical temporal regularities are fundamental for human cognitive auditory abilities such as speech or beat entrainment. Because the comparison of the neural sensitivity to temporal regularities between human and animals is fundamental to relate non-invasive measures of auditory processing to their neuronal basis, here we compared the neural representation of auditory periodicities between human and non-human primates by measuring scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR). We found that rhesus monkeys can resolve the spectrotemporal structure of periodic stimuli to a similar extent as humans by exhibiting a homologous FFR potential to the speech syllable /da/. The FFR in both species is robust and phase-locked to the fundamental frequency of the sound, reflecting an effective neural processing of the fast-periodic information of subsyllabic cues. Our results thus reveal a conserved neural ability to track acoustical regularities within the primate order. These findings open the possibility to study the neurophysiology of complex sound temporal processing in the macaque subcortical and cortical areas, as well as the associated experience-dependent plasticity across the auditory pathway in behaving monkeys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.