Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29192068›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2017

Passive elongation of muscle fascicles in human muscles with short and long tendons.

Jeanette M Thom, Joanna Diong, Peter W Stubbs, Robert D Herbert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanette M ThomSchool of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Joanna DiongNeuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, Australia.
Peter W StubbsNeuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, Australia.
Robert D HerbertSchool of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Neuroscience Research Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that the ratio of changes in muscle fascicle and tendon length that occurs with joint movement scales linearly with the ratio of the slack lengths of the muscle fascicles and tendons. We compared the contribution of muscle fascicles to passive muscle-tendon lengthening in muscles with relatively short and long fascicles. Fifteen healthy adults participated in the study. The medial gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and brachialis muscle-tendon units were passively lengthened by slowly rotating the ankle or elbow. Change in muscle fascicle length was measured with ultrasonography. Change in muscle-tendon length was calculated from estimated muscle moment arms. Change in tendon length was calculated by subtracting change in fascicle length from change in muscle-tendon length. The median (IQR) contribution of muscle fascicles to passive lengthening of the muscle-tendon unit, measured as the ratio of the change in fascicle length to the change in muscle-tendon unit length, was 0.39 (0.26-0.48) for the medial gastrocnemius, 0.51 (0.29-0.60) for tibialis anterior, and 0.65 (0.49-0.90) for brachialis. Brachialis muscle fascicles contributed to muscle-tendon unit lengthening significantly more than medial gastrocnemius muscle fascicles, but less than would be expected if the fascicle contribution scaled linearly with the ratio of muscle fascicle and tendon slack lengths.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFasciaFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalTendonsBrachialisfascicle lengthgastrocnemiustendontibialis anteriorultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29192068
PMCPMC5727281
OpenAlexW2771852460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.