Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018
Time for a Time Window Extension: Insights from Late Presenters in the ESCAPE Trial.
Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mortality, functional outcome, and bleeding risk after early versus delayed thrombectomy.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative validation of automated perfusion analysis software for ischemic penumbra estimation and EVT decision-making.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Ruptured bilateral brain arteriovenous malformations in a young woman with early pregnancy: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2023Article
- Outcomes with Endovascular Treatment of Patients with M2 Segment MCA Occlusion in the Late Time Window.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Aspiration thrombectomy with the Penumbra System for patients with stroke and late onset to treatment: a subset analysis of the COMPLETE registry.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset or in extended time windows: an individualized approach.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021Review
- Diagnosis and management of acute ischaemic stroke.Practical neurology · 2020Review
- Imaging Triage of Patients with Late-Window (6-24 Hours) Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Study Using Multiphase CT Angiography versus CT Perfusion.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Observational
- Collaterals are a major determinant of the core but not the penumbra volume in acute ischemic stroke.Neuroradiology · 2019Article
- Mechanical Thrombectomy in Strokes with Large-Vessel Occlusion Beyond 6 Hours: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for large-artery stroke in the extended time window is not yet well-established. We performed a subgroup analysis on subjects enrolled within an extended time window in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) trial. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-nine of 315 subjects (33 in the intervention group and 26 in the control group) were randomized in the ESCAPE trial between 5.5 and 12 hours after last seen healthy (likely to have groin puncture administered 6 hours after that). Treatment effect sizes for all relevant outcomes (90-day mRS shift, mRS 0-2, mRS 0-1, and 24-hour NIHSS scores and intracerebral hemorrhage) were reported using unadjusted and adjusted analyses.
resultsThere was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity between subjects in the early and late windows. Treatment effect favoring intervention was seen across all clinical outcomes in the extended time window (absolute risk difference of 19.3% for mRS 0-2 at 90 days). There were more asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage events within the intervention arm (48.5% versus 11.5%,
conclusionsPatients with an extended time window could potentially benefit from endovascular treatment. Ongoing randomized controlled trials using imaging to identify late presenters with favorable brain physiology will help cement the paradigm of using time windows to select the population for acute imaging and imaging to select individual patients for therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.