Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29191815›Full record

Observational studySexually transmitted infections2018

Sexual relationships, intimate partner violence and STI partner notification in Cape Town, South Africa: an observational study.

Catherine Mathews, Moira O Kalichman, Ria Laubscher, Cameron Hutchison, Koena Nkoko, Mark Lurie, Seth C Kalichman

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sexually transmitted infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Attitudes toward partner notification ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Partner notification and STI patient experiences in Ekurhuleni East, Gauteng, South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine MathewsHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Moira O KalichmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Ria LaubscherBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Cameron HutchisonHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Koena NkokoCity of Cape Town Health Department, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mark LurieBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Seth C KalichmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Connecticut · USBrown University · USCity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Enhanced STI/HIV Partner Notification in South AfricaR01HD074560 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to identify individual and sexual partnership characteristics associated with partner notification (PN) among people with STI. We hypothesised that PN would be less likely in more casual sexual partnerships and in partnerships with intimate partner violence (IPV).

methodsWe conducted an observational study among the first 330 patients with STI enrolled in a trial of a behavioural intervention to reduce STI incidence, at a clinic in a poor, Cape Town community. We included 195 index patients (those reporting STI symptoms), and conducted longitudinal analyses using participant-completed questionnaires on the day of diagnosis and 2 weeks later. Using partnership data for five recent sexual partners, we assessed factors associated with reported PN with logistic regressions, adjusting for repeated measurements on the same participant for each partner.

resultsThe sample included 99 males with 303 partners and 96 females with 158 partners. Males reported perpetrating IPV in 46.2% of partnerships. Females reported being IPV victims in 53.2% of partnerships. Males notified 58.1%, females 75.4% of partners during the 2 weeks following diagnosis. Type of partner was an independent correlate of PN for males and females, with the odds of PN lower in more casual partnerships. For males, reporting physical IPV perpetration in the partnership was an independent correlate of PN. For females, there was no association between IPV victimisation in a partnership and PN.

conclusionsEfforts to decrease the pool of infectious partners need to have a strong focus on the promotion of PN in casual relationships and one-night stands. IPV was not identified as a barrier to PN. In future, we need to investigate the association between IPV with an objective measure of PN success such as partner testing or treatment, or index patient reinfection. CLINICAL

trial registrationPACTR201606001682364; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Contact TracingIntimate Partner ViolenceSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesSexual PartnersAdultAge FactorsCrime VictimsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsRisk-Takingafricacontact tracingpartner notification

Identifiers

PMID29191815
PMCPMC5870461
OpenAlexW2775232386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.