Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29191772›Full record

ArticleBrain research2018

Gap-induced reductions of evoked potentials in the auditory cortex: A possible objective marker for the presence of tinnitus in animals.

Joel I Berger, William Owen, Caroline A Wilson, Adam Hockley, Ben Coomber, Alan R Palmer, Mark N Wallace

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Test, Supplementary to Behavioral Tests for Evaluation of the Salicylate-Induced Tinnitus.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joel I BergerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: joel.berger@nottingham.ac.uk.
William OwenMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Caroline A WilsonMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Adam HockleyMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Ben CoomberMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Alan R PalmerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Mark N WallaceMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
MRC Institute of Hearing Research · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097126Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models of tinnitus are essential for determining the underlying mechanisms and testing pharmacotherapies. However, there is doubt over the validity of current behavioural methods for detecting tinnitus. Here, we applied a stimulus paradigm widely used in a behavioural test (gap-induced inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex GPIAS) whilst recording from the auditory cortex, and showed neural response changes that mirror those found in the behavioural tests. We implanted guinea pigs (GPs) with electrocorticographic (ECoG) arrays and recorded baseline auditory cortical responses to a startling stimulus. When a gap was inserted in otherwise continuous background noise prior to the startling stimulus, there was a clear reduction in the subsequent evoked response (termed gap-induced reductions in evoked potentials; GIREP), suggestive of a neural analogue of the GPIAS test. We then unilaterally exposed guinea pigs to narrowband noise (left ear; 8-10 kHz; 1 h) at one of two different sound levels - either 105 dB SPL or 120 dB SPL - and recorded the same responses seven-to-ten weeks following the noise exposure. Significant deficits in GIREP were observed for all areas of the auditory cortex (AC) in the 120 dB-exposed GPs, but not in the 105 dB-exposed GPs. These deficits could not simply be accounted for by changes in response amplitudes. Furthermore, in the contralateral (right) caudal AC we observed a significant increase in evoked potential amplitudes across narrowband background frequencies in both 105 dB and 120 dB-exposed GPs. Taken in the context of the large body of literature that has used the behavioural test as a demonstration of the presence of tinnitus, these results are suggestive of objective neural correlates of the presence of noise-induced tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAuditory CortexDisease Models, AnimalElectrocardiographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleFunctional LateralityGuinea PigsMaleNoisePsychoacousticsReflex, StartleTinnitusAuditory cortexChronic recordingNoise exposureTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID29191772
PMCPMC5780299
OpenAlexW2769176425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.