Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29191628›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2018

Resurgence of scarlet fever in England, 2014-16: a population-based surveillance study.

Theresa Lamagni, Rebecca Guy, Meera Chand, Katherine L Henderson, Victoria Chalker, James Lewis, Vanessa Saliba, Alex J Elliot, Gillian E Smith, Stephen Rushton and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tracing the recent evolution of Group AEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Case Report: FatalFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multi-country surveillance of paediatric invasive group AEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Post-pandemic upsurge in Group AMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa LamagniNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infection & Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College, London, UK. Electronic address: theresa.lamagni@phe.gov.uk.
Rebecca GuyNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Meera ChandNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK; Department of Infectious Diseases, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Respiratory Infections, Imperial College, London, UK.
Katherine L HendersonNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Victoria ChalkerNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infection & Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College, London, UK.
James LewisEmergency Response Department Science and Technology, Health Protection Directorate, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Vanessa SalibaNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Alex J ElliotNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Gillian E SmithNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Stephen RushtonSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Elizabeth A SheridanNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Mary RamsayNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Alan P JohnsonNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infection & Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College, London, UK.
Public Health England · GBImperial College London · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P022669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter decades of decreasing scarlet fever incidence, a dramatic increase was seen in England beginning in 2014. Investigations were launched to assess clinical and epidemiological patterns and identify potential causes.

methodsIn this population-based surveillance study, we analysed statutory scarlet fever notifications held by Public Health England from 1911 to 2016 in England and Wales to identify periods of sudden escalation of scarlet fever. Characteristics of cases and outbreaks in England including frequency of complications and hospital admissions were assessed and compared with the pre-upsurge period. Isolates from throat swabs were obtained and were emm typed.

findingsData were retrieved for our analysis between Jan 1, 1911, and Dec 31, 2016. Population rates of scarlet fever increased by a factor of three between 2013 and 2014 from 8·2 to 27·2 per 100 000 (rate ratio [RR] 3·34, 95% CI 3·23-3·45; p<0·0001); further increases were observed in 2015 (30·6 per 100 000) and in 2016 (33·2 per 100 000), which reached the highest number of cases (19 206) and rate of scarlet fever notifcation since 1967. The median age of cases in 2014 was 4 years (IQR 3-7) with an incidence of 186 per 100 000 children under age 10 years. All parts of England saw an increase in incidence, with 620 outbreaks reported in 2016. Hospital admissions for scarlet fever increased by 97% between 2013 and 2016; one in 40 cases were admitted for management of the condition or potential complications. Analysis of strains (n=303) identified a diversity of emm types with emm3 (43%), emm12 (15%), emm1 (11%), and emm4 (9%) being the most common. Longitudinal analysis identified 4-yearly periodicity in population incidence of scarlet fever but of consistently lower magnitude than the current escalation.

interpretationEngland is experiencing an unprecedented rise in scarlet fever with the highest incidence for nearly 50 years. Reasons for this escalation are unclear and identifying these remains a public health priority.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier ProteinsChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable Diseases, EmergingEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHumansIncidenceAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCarrier Proteinsstreptococcal M protein

Identifiers

PMID29191628
OpenAlexW2768964340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.