Trial reportEBioMedicine2017
Epitope-Specific Immunotherapy Targeting CD4-Positive T Cells in Celiac Disease: Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Effects on Intestinal Histology and Plasma Cytokines with Escalating Dose Regimens of Nexvax2 in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02528799 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Nexvax2 Preceded by a Dose Titration Period in Subjects With Celiac Disease Currently on a Gluten-Free Diet), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Nexvax2 Preceded by a Dose Titration Period in Subjects With Celiac Disease Currently on a Gluten-Free Diet
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytokine release and gastrointestinal symptoms after gluten challenge in celiac disease.Science advances · 2019Trial
- From gluten to therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of celiac disease and emerging alternatives to the gluten-free diet.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Rethinking Celiac Disease Management: Treatment Approaches Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Is There a Future Without Gluten Restrictions for Celiac Patients? Update on Current Treatments.Nutrients · 2025Review
- New Therapeutic Challenges in Pediatric Gastroenterology: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Celiac Disease-Narrative Review on Progress in Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Celiac Disease: Beyond Diet and Food Awareness.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrated network pharmacology andFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Budesonide Induces Favourable Histologic and Symptomatic Recovery in Patients with Non-responsive and Refractory Coeliac Disease When Given in an Open Capsule Format.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Tolerance-inducing therapies in coeliac disease - mechanisms, progress and future directions.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Review
- Article
- Celiac disease: mechanisms and emerging therapeutics.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023Review
- Unraveling the Immunopathological Landscape of Celiac Disease: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Peptide-based immunotherapy in lupus: Where are we now?Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023Review
- Old and New Adjunctive Therapies in Celiac Disease and Refractory Celiac Disease: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- New Developments in Celiac Disease Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Neurological Manifestations of Celiac Disease and Its Treatment.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- New Insights into Non-Dietary Treatment in Celiac Disease: Emerging Therapeutic Options.Nutrients · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNexvax2® is a novel, peptide-based, epitope-specific immunotherapy intended to be administered by regular injections at dose levels that increase the threshold for clinical reactivity to natural exposure to gluten and ultimately restore tolerance to gluten in patients with celiac disease. Celiac disease patients administered fixed intradermal doses of Nexvax2 become unresponsive to the HLA-DQ2·5-restricted gluten epitopes in Nexvax2, but gastrointestinal symptoms and cytokine release mimicking gluten exposure, that accompany the first dose, limit the maximum tolerated dose to 150μg. Our aim was to test whether stepwise dose escalation attenuated the first dose effect of Nexvax2 in celiac disease patients.
methodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at four community sites in Australia (3) and New Zealand (1) in HLA-DQ2·5 genotype positive adults with celiac disease who were on a gluten-free diet. Participants were assigned to cohort 1 if they were HLA-DQ2·5 homozygotes; other participants were assigned to cohort 2, or to cohort 3 subsequent to completion of cohort 2. Manual central randomization without blocking was used to assign treatment for each cohort. Initially, Nexvax2-treated participants in cohorts 1 and 2 received an intradermal dose of 30μg (consisting of 10μg of each constituent peptide), followed by 60μg, 90μg, 150μg, and then eight doses of 300μg over six weeks, but this was amended to include doses of 3μg and 9μg and extended over a total of seven weeks. Nexvax2-treated participants in cohort 3 received doses of 3μg, 9μg, 30μg, 60μg, 90μg, 150μg, 300μg, 450μg, 600μg, 750μg, and then eight of 900μg over nine weeks. The dose interval was 3 or 4days. Participants, care providers, data managers, sponsor personnel, and study site personnel were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the number of adverse events and percentage of participants with adverse events during the treatment period. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02528799.
findingsFrom the 73 participants who we screened from 19 August 2015 to 31 October 2016, 24 did not meet eligibility criteria, and 36 were ultimately randomized and received study drug. For cohort 1, seven participants received Nexvax2 (two with the starting dose of 30μg and then five at 3μg) and three received placebo. For cohort 2, 10 participants received Nexvax2 (four with starting dose of 30μg and then six at 3μg) and four received placebo. For cohort 3, 10 participants received Nexvax2 and two received placebo. All 36 participants were included in safety and immune analyses, and 33 participants completed treatment and follow-up; in cohort 3, 11 participants were assessed and included in pharmacokinetics and duodenal histology analyses. Whereas the maximum dose of Nexvax2 had previously been limited by adverse events and cytokine release, no such effect was observed when dosing escalated from 3μg up to 300μg in HLA-DQ2·5 homozygotes or to 900μg in HLA-DQ2.5 non-homozygotes. Adverse events with Nexvax2 treatment were less common in cohorts 1 and 2 with the starting dose of 3μg (72 for 11 participants) than with the starting dose of 30μg (91 for six participants). Adverse events during the treatment period in placebo-treated participants (46 for nine participants) were similar to those in Nexvax2-treated participants when the starting dose was 3μg in cohort 1 (16 for five participants), cohort 2 (56 for six participants), and cohort 3 (44 for 10 participants). Two participants in cohort 2 and one in cohort 3 who received Nexvax2 starting at 3μg did not report any adverse event, while the other 33 participants experienced at least one adverse event. One participant, who was in cohort 1, withdrew from the study due to adverse events, which included abdominal pain graded moderate or severe and associated with nausea after receiving the starting dose of 30μg and one 60μg dose. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the Nexvax2 participants were headache (52%), diarrhoea (48%), nausea (37%), abdominal pain (26%), and abdominal discomfort (19%). Administration of Nexvax2 at dose levels from 150μg to 900μg preceded by dose escalation was not associated with elevations in plasma cytokines at 4h. Nexvax2 treatment was associated with trends towards improved duodenal histology. Plasma concentrations of Nexvax2 peptides were dose-dependent.
interpretationWe show that antigenic peptides recognized by CD4-positive T cells in an autoimmune disease can be safely administered to patients at high maintenance dose levels without immune activation if preceded by gradual dose escalation. These findings facilitate efficacy studies that test high-dose epitope-specific immunotherapy in celiac disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.