Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29191230›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2017

Implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings: managing tensions in rehabilitation care.

Femke Hoekstra, Marjolein A G van Offenbeek, Rienk Dekker, Florentina J Hettinga, Trynke Hoekstra, Lucas H V van der Woude, Cees P van der Schans, ReSpAct group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06018285 (Stepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06018285 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Stepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorCynthia FontanellaRan2023 to 2027Enrolled2,572ConditionsSuicidal Ideation, Suicide, Attempted, Suicide PreventionArmsStepped Approach to Reducing Risk of Suicide in Primary Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Repeated measures of implementation variables.Frontiers in health services · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Femke HoekstraCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. f.hoekstra@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-652X
Marjolein A G van OffenbeekHealthwise, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rienk DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Florentina J HettingaSchool of Biological Sciences, Center of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Trynke HoekstraCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lucas H V van der WoudeCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700, AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cees P van der SchansDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
ReSpAct group
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport 319758Stichting Beatrixoord Noord-Nederland n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity is acknowledged, little is known about heterogeneity in fidelity over time. This study aims to generate insight into the heterogeneity in implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings and the relationship with changes in patients' health behavior.

methodsThis study used longitudinal data from the nationwide implementation of an evidence-informed physical activity promotion program in Dutch rehabilitation care. Fidelity scores were calculated based on annual surveys filled in by involved professionals (n = ± 70). Higher fidelity scores indicate a more complete implementation of the program's core components. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on the implementation fidelity scores of 17 organizations at three different time points. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to explore organizational and professional differences between identified trajectories. Regression analyses were conducted to determine differences in patient outcomes.

resultsThree trajectories were identified as the following: 'stable high fidelity' (n = 9), 'moderate and improving fidelity' (n = 6), and 'unstable fidelity' (n = 2). The stable high fidelity organizations were generally smaller, started earlier, and implemented the program in a more structured way compared to moderate and improving fidelity organizations. At the implementation period's start and end, support from physicians and physiotherapists, professionals' appreciation, and program compatibility were rated more positively by professionals working in stable high fidelity organizations as compared to the moderate and improving fidelity organizations (p < .05). Qualitative data showed that the stable high fidelity organizations had often an explicit vision and strategy about the implementation of the program. Intriguingly, the trajectories were not associated with patients' self-reported physical activity outcomes (adjusted model β = - 651.6, t(613) = - 1032, p = .303).

conclusionsDifferences in organizational-level implementation fidelity trajectories did not result in outcome differences at patient-level. This suggests that an effective implementation fidelity trajectory is contingent on the local organization's conditions. More specifically, achieving stable high implementation fidelity required the management of tensions: realizing a localized change vision, while safeguarding the program's standardized core components and engaging the scarce physicians throughout the process. When scaling up evidence-informed health promotion programs, we propose to tailor the management of implementation tensions to local organizations' starting position, size, and circumstances.

trial registrationThe Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3961 . Registered 18 April 2013.

Indexed as

ExerciseCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRehabilitation ResearchActive lifestyleDisseminationKnowledge-translationMixed-methodsMultidisciplinary care

Identifiers

PMID29191230
PMCPMC5709964
OpenAlexW2775625228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.