Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29191207›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Medical subdomain classification of clinical notes using a machine learning-based natural language processing approach.

Wei-Hung Weng, Kavishwar B Wagholikar, Alexa T McCray, Peter Szolovits, Henry C Chueh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating Large Language Models in Extracting Cognitive Exam Dates and Scores.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medical Specialty Classification Based on Semiadversarial Data Augmentation.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei-Hung WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. ckbjimmy@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-0390
Kavishwar B WagholikarLaboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 750, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Alexa T McCrayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Peter SzolovitsComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 32 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Henry C ChuehLaboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 750, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

iDASH: Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization, and SharingU54HL108460 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2010 to 2015
$19.1M
A Framework to Enhance Decision Support by Invoking NLP: Methods and ApplicationsR00LM011575 · NLM · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WAGHOLIKAR, KAVISHWAR B. · 2016 to 2018
$749k
National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health 5R00LM011575NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL108460NLM NIH HHS R00 LM011575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe medical subdomain of a clinical note, such as cardiology or neurology, is useful content-derived metadata for developing machine learning downstream applications. To classify the medical subdomain of a note accurately, we have constructed a machine learning-based natural language processing (NLP) pipeline and developed medical subdomain classifiers based on the content of the note.

methodsWe constructed the pipeline using the clinical NLP system, clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES), the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus, Semantic Network, and learning algorithms to extract features from two datasets - clinical notes from Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization, and Sharing (iDASH) data repository (n = 431) and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) (n = 91,237), and built medical subdomain classifiers with different combinations of data representation methods and supervised learning algorithms. We evaluated the performance of classifiers and their portability across the two datasets.

resultsThe convolutional recurrent neural network with neural word embeddings trained-medical subdomain classifier yielded the best performance measurement on iDASH and MGH datasets with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.975 and 0.991, and F1 scores of 0.845 and 0.870, respectively. Considering better clinical interpretability, linear support vector machine-trained medical subdomain classifier using hybrid bag-of-words and clinically relevant UMLS concepts as the feature representation, with term frequency-inverse document frequency (tf-idf)-weighting, outperformed other shallow learning classifiers on iDASH and MGH datasets with AUC of 0.957 and 0.964, and F1 scores of 0.932 and 0.934 respectively. We trained classifiers on one dataset, applied to the other dataset and yielded the threshold of F1 score of 0.7 in classifiers for half of the medical subdomains we studied.

conclusionOur study shows that a supervised learning-based NLP approach is useful to develop medical subdomain classifiers. The deep learning algorithm with distributed word representation yields better performance yet shallow learning algorithms with the word and concept representation achieves comparable performance with better clinical interpretability. Portable classifiers may also be used across datasets from different institutions.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingMachine LearningMedical RecordsNatural Language ProcessingUnified Medical Language SystemHumansDeep LearningDistributed RepresentationMachine LearningMedical Decision Making, Computer-assistedNatural Language ProcessingUnified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID29191207
PMCPMC5709846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.