Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190972›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Development of estrogen receptor beta binding prediction model using large sets of chemicals.

Sugunadevi Sakkiah, Chandrabose Selvaraj, Ping Gong, Chaoyang Zhang, Weida Tong, Huixiao Hong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  5. Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Liver Toxicity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sugunadevi SakkiahDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Chandrabose SelvarajDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Ping GongEnvironmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Chaoyang ZhangSchool of Computer Science, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Weida TongDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
Huixiao HongDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA.
National Center for Toxicological Research · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of Southern Mississippi · USU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed an ER

Indexed as

decision forestestrogen receptorMold2predictive modelQSAR

Identifiers

PMID29190972
PMCPMC5696238
OpenAlexW2761600385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.