Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190793›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Transcriptome analysis of WRKY gene family in Oryza officinalis Wall ex Watt and WRKY genes involved in responses to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae stress.

Chunmiao Jiang, Qingxi J Shen, Bo Wang, Bin He, Suqin Xiao, Ling Chen, Tengqiong Yu, Xue Ke, Qiaofang Zhong, Jian Fu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  3. Genome-wide analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chunmiao JiangBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Qingxi J ShenSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.
Bo WangBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Bin HeJiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, P.R. China.
Suqin XiaoBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Ling ChenBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Tengqiong YuBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Xue KeBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Qiaofang ZhongBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Jian FuBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Yue ChenBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Lingxian WangBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Fuyou YinBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Dunyu ZhangBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Walid GhidanRice Research & Training Center, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Sakha, Kafr Elsheikh, Egypt.
Xingqi HuangBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Zaiquan ChengBiotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAgricultural Research Center · EGJiangxi Science and Technology Normal University · CNUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · USYunnan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oryza officinalis Wall ex Watt, a very important and special wild rice species, shows abundant genetic diversity and disease resistance features, especially high resistance to bacterial blight. The molecular mechanisms of bacterial blight resistance in O. officinalis have not yet been elucidated. The WRKY transcription factor family is one of the largest gene families involved in plant growth, development and stress response. However, little is known about the numbers, structure, molecular phylogenetics, and expression of the WRKY genes under Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) stress in O. officinalis due to lacking of O. officinalis genome. Therefore, based on the RNA-sequencing data of O. officinalis, we performed a comprehensive study of WRKY genes in O. officinalis and identified 89 OoWRKY genes. Then 89 OoWRKY genes were classified into three groups based on the WRKY domains and zinc finger motifs. Phylogenetic analysis strongly supported that the evolution of OoWRKY genes were consistent with previous studies of WRKYs, and subgroup IIc OoWRKY genes were the original ancestors of some group II and group III OoWRKYs. Among the 89 OoWRKY genes, eight OoWRKYs displayed significantly different expression (>2-fold, p<0.01) in the O. officinalis transcriptome under Xoo strains PXO99 and C5 stress 48 h, suggesting these genes might play important role in PXO99 and C5 stress responses in O. officinalis. QRT-PCR analysis and confirmation of eight OoWRKYs expression patterns revealed that they responded strongly to PXO99 and C5 stress 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, and the trends of these genes displaying marked changes were consistent with the 48 h RNA-sequencing data, demonstrated these genes played important roles in response to biotic stress and might even involved in the bacterial blight resistance. Tissue expression profiles of eight OoWRKY genes revealed that they were highly expressed in root, stem, leaf, and flower, especially in leaf (except OoWRKY71), suggesting these genes might be also important for plant growth and organ development. In this study, we analyzed the WRKY family of transcription factors in O.officinalis. Insight was gained into the classification, evolution, and function of the OoWRKY genes, revealing the putative roles of eight significantly different expression OoWRKYs in Xoo strains PXO99 and C5 stress responses in O.officinalis. This study provided a better understanding of the evolution and functions of O. officinalis WRKY genes, and suggested that manipulating eight significantly different expression OoWRKYs would enhance resistance to bacterial blight.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantMultigene FamilyTranscriptomeOryzaPhylogenyXanthomonas

Identifiers

PMID29190793
PMCPMC5708796
OpenAlexW2772162757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.