ArticlePloS one2017
Measuring couple relationship quality in a rural African population: Validation of a Couple Functionality Assessment Tool in Malawi.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intimate partner violence and its relation to sexual health outcomes across different adult populations: a systematic review.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Pooled it
- Caregivers' early stimulation behaviors on early child development outcomes in Northern Ghana.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Mlambe economic and relationship-strengthening intervention for alcohol use decreases violence and improves relationship quality in couples living with HIV in Malawi.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Prevalence and correlates of maternal early stimulation behaviors during pregnancy in northern Ghana: a cross-sectional survey.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Trial
- Exploring how men and women improve their relationships through participation in HIKA, a group-based, couples-focused IPV prevention program in the Democratic Republic of Congo.Culture, health & sexuality · 2025Article
- Psychometric Validation of Trust, Commitment, and Satisfaction Scales to Measure Marital Relationship Quality Among Newly Married Women in Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Relationship Dynamics and Young Women's Contraceptive Use.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2024Article
- Development and Empirical Test of the Research-Informed South African Relationship Functioning Assessment (SARFA).Personal Relationships · 2024Article
- Supportive couple relationships buffer against the harms of HIV stigma on HIV treatment adherence.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Relationship Dynamics are Associated with Self-Reported Adherence but not an Objective Adherence Measure in Malawi.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Effects of the Waya Intervention on Marital Satisfaction and HIV Risk Behaviors in Western Kenya: A Pre-Post Study Design.Archives of sexual behavior · 2022Article
- Factors associated with men's health facility attendance as clients and caregivers in Malawi: a community-representative survey.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Couple Efficacy and Communal Coping for HIV Prevention Among Kenyan Pregnant Couples.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of the Couple Sexual Satisfaction Scale for HIV and Sexual Health Research.Archives of sexual behavior · 2021Article
- Enhancing LPG Adoption in Ghana (ELAG): A Trial Testing Policy-Relevant Interventions to Increase Sustained Use of Clean Fuels.Sustainability · 2021Article
- Re-conceptualising gender and power relations for sexual and reproductive health: contrasting narratives of tradition, unity, and rights.Culture, health & sexuality · 2020Article
- Individual and Relationship Predictors of Couple-Level Sexual Concurrency in Heterosexual South African Couples.Archives of sexual behavior · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Available data suggest that individual and family well-being are linked to the quality of women's and men's couple relationships, but few tools exist to assess couple relationship functioning in low- and middle-income countries. In response to this gap, Catholic Relief Services has developed a Couple Functionality Assessment Tool (CFAT) to capture valid and reliable data on various domains of relationship quality. This tool is designed to be used by interventions which aim to improve couple and family well-being as a means of measuring the effectiveness of these interventions, particularly related to couple relationship quality. We carried out a validation study of the CFAT among 401 married and cohabiting adults (203 women and 198 men) in rural Chikhwawa District, Malawi. Using psychometric scales, the CFAT addressed six domains of couple relationship quality (intimacy, partner support, sexual satisfaction, gender roles, decision-making, and communication and conflict management), and included questions on intimate partner violence. We used exploratory factor analysis to assess scale performance of each domain and produce a shortened Relationship Quality Index (RQI) composed of items from five relationship quality domains. This article reports the performance of the RQI. Internal reliability and validity of the RQI were found to be good. Regression analyses examined the relationship of the RQI to outcomes important to health and development: intra-household cooperation, positive health behaviors, intimate partner violence, and gender-equitable norms. We found many significant correlations between RQI scores and these couple- and family-level development issues. There is a need to further validate the tool with use in other populations as well as to continue to explore whether the observed linkages between couple functionality and development outcomes are causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.