Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190735›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Subgroup analysis of continuous renal replacement therapy in severely burned patients.

Jaechul Yoon, Youngmin Kim, Dohern Kym, Jun Hur, Haejun Yim, Yong-Suk Cho, Wook Chun

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Filter Lifespan, Treatment Effect, and Influencing Factors of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Burn Patients.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Renal Replacement Therapy in Severe Burns: A Multicenter Observational Study.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaechul YoonDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Youngmin KimDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Dohern KymDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-0599
Jun HurDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Haejun YimDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Yong-Suk ChoDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Wook ChunDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Hallym University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is administered to critically ill patients with renal injuries as renal replacement or renal support. We aimed to identify predictors of mortality among burn patients receiving CRRT, and to investigate clinical differences according to acute kidney injury (AKI) status. This retrospective observational study evaluated 216 Korean burn patients who received CRRT at a burn intensive care unit. Patients were categorized by AKI status. Data were collected regarding arterial pH, laboratory results, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PF ratio), and urine production. Among surviving patients, CRRT duration and the sequential organ failure assessment score were 6.5 days and 4.7 in the non-AKI group and 23.4 days and 7.4 in the AKI group, respectively (p = 0.003 and p = 0.008). On logistic regression analyses, mortality was significantly associated with a pH of <7.2 (p = 0.004), potassium levels of >5.0 mEg/L (p = 0.045), creatinine levels of >2.0 mg/dL (p = 0.011), lactate levels of >2 mmol/L (p<0.001), a PF ratio of <200 (p = 0.042), and a platelet count of <100,000/μL (p<0.001). In the AKI group, poor outcomes were associated with a pH of <7.2, potassium levels of <5.0 mEg/L, lactate levels of >2 mmol/L, and a platelet count of <100,000/μL, while good outcomes were associated with creatinine levels of >2 mg/dL. In the non-AKI group, poor outcomes were associated with lactate levels of >1.5 mmol/L, a PF ratio of <200, and a platelet count of <100,000/μL, while good outcomes were associated with creatinine levels of >1.2 mg/dL. Duration of the CRRT application and the requirement for either renal replacement or renal support at the initiation of CRRT application are important considerations depending on its application.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBurnsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal Replacement TherapyRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29190735
PMCPMC5708827
OpenAlexW2775675642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.