Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190725›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Modelling the effects of quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Puerto Rico.

Ana Patricia Ortiz, Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz, Moraima Ríos, José Laborde, Amit Kulkarni, Matthew Pillsbury, Andreas Lauschke, Homero A Monsanto, Cecile Marques-Goyco

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Patricia OrtizCancer Control and Population Sciences Program, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Karen J Ortiz-OrtizCancer Control and Population Sciences Program, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Moraima RíosGraduate School of Public Health, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
José LabordeDepartment of Economics, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Amit KulkarniMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States of America.
Matthew PillsburyMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States of America.
Andreas LauschkeLauschke Consulting, New York, New York, United States of America.
Homero A MonsantoHealth Outcomes Research Regional Lead, Latin America Medical Affairs, Merck & Co, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Cecile Marques-GoycoHealth Outcomes Research Regional Lead, Latin America Medical Affairs, Merck & Co, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus · PRUniversity of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras · PRUniversity of Puerto Rico System · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo study has estimated the potential impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Puerto Rico, a population with considerable burden of HPV-related morbidities. We evaluated the health and economic impacts of implementing a vaccination strategy for females and males in Puerto Rico, with the quadrivalent HPV (HPV4) vaccine, under different vaccination scenarios.

methodsWe adapted a mathematical model which estimates the direct and indirect health benefits and costs of HPV4 vaccination in a dynamic population. The model compared three vaccination scenarios against screening only (no-vaccination) for three doses of HPV4 vaccine among individuals aged 11-15 years in Puerto Rico: 1) 34% for females and 13% for males (34%F/13%M), 2) 50% for females and 40% for males (50%F/40%M), and 3) 80% for female and 64% for male (80%F/64%M). Data specific to Puerto Rico was used. When not available, values from the United States were used. Input data consisted of demographic, behavioral, epidemiological, screening, and economic parameters.

resultsThe model predicted decreases in: 1) HPV infection prevalence for females and males, 2) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer incidence for females, 3) genital warts incidence for females and males, and 4) cervical cancer deaths among females, when various vaccination program scenarios were considered. In addition, when the vaccination percentage was increased in every scenario, the reduction was greater and began earlier. The analysis also evidenced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,964 per quality-adjusted life year gained for the 80%F/64%M uptake scenario.

conclusionsHPV vaccine can prove its cost effectiveness and substantially reduce the burden and costs associated to various HPV-related conditions when targeted to the adequate population together with an organized HPV vaccination program.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdolescentAlphapapillomavirusChildFemaleHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPuerto RicoPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29190725
PMCPMC5708664
OpenAlexW2774002102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.