Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190703›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Developing an eye-tracking algorithm as a potential tool for early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in children.

Natalia I Vargas-Cuentas, Avid Roman-Gonzalez, Robert H Gilman, Franklin Barrientos, James Ting, Daniela Hidalgo, Kelly Jensen, Mirko Zimic

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia I Vargas-CuentasBioinformatics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Research and Development Laboratory, Science and Philosophy Faculty, University Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Avid Roman-GonzalezBioinformatics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Research and Development Laboratory, Science and Philosophy Faculty, University Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Robert H GilmanDepartment of International Health. School of Public Health. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Franklin BarrientosBioinformatics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Research and Development Laboratory, Science and Philosophy Faculty, University Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
James TingSchool of Medicine. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Daniela HidalgoBioinformatics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Research and Development Laboratory, Science and Philosophy Faculty, University Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Kelly JensenTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States of America.
Mirko ZimicBioinformatics and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Research and Development Laboratory, Science and Philosophy Faculty, University Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-8847
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEJohns Hopkins University · USTulane University · US

Funding

Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating CenterR25TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.9M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009340Medical Research Council MR/K007467/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) currently affects nearly 1 in 160 children worldwide. In over two-thirds of evaluations, no validated diagnostics are used and gold standard diagnostic tools are used in less than 5% of evaluations. Currently, the diagnosis of ASD requires lengthy and expensive tests, in addition to clinical confirmation. Therefore, fast, cheap, portable, and easy-to-administer screening instruments for ASD are required. Several studies have shown that children with ASD have a lower preference for social scenes compared with children without ASD. Based on this, eye-tracking and measurement of gaze preference for social scenes has been used as a screening tool for ASD. Currently available eye-tracking software requires intensive calibration, training, or holding of the head to prevent interference with gaze recognition limiting its use in children with ASD.

methodsIn this study, we designed a simple eye-tracking algorithm that does not require calibration or head holding, as a platform for future validation of a cost-effective ASD potential screening instrument. This system operates on a portable and inexpensive tablet to measure gaze preference of children for social compared to abstract scenes. A child watches a one-minute stimulus video composed of a social scene projected on the left side and an abstract scene projected on the right side of the tablet's screen. We designed five stimulus videos by changing the social/abstract scenes. Every child observed all the five videos in random order. We developed an eye-tracking algorithm that calculates the child's gaze preference for the social and abstract scenes, estimated as the percentage of the accumulated time that the child observes the left or right side of the screen, respectively. Twenty-three children without a prior history of ASD and 8 children with a clinical diagnosis of ASD were evaluated. The recorded video of the child´s eye movement was analyzed both manually by an observer and automatically by our algorithm.

resultsThis study demonstrates that the algorithm correctly differentiates visual preference for either the left or right side of the screen (social or abstract scenes), identifies distractions, and maintains high accuracy compared to the manual classification. The error of the algorithm was 1.52%, when compared to the gold standard of manual observation. DISCUSSION: This tablet-based gaze preference/eye-tracking algorithm can estimate gaze preference in both children with ASD and without ASD to a high degree of accuracy, without the need for calibration, training, or restraint of the children. This system can be utilized in low-resource settings as a portable and cost-effective potential screening tool for ASD.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEye MovementsAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChild, PreschoolComputer GraphicsEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID29190703
PMCPMC5708820
OpenAlexW2774716223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.