Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190011›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2018

Relevance of genetic relationship in GWAS and genomic prediction.

Helcio Duarte Pereira, José Marcelo Soriano Viana, Andréa Carla Bastos Andrade, Fabyano Fonseca E Silva, Geísa Pinheiro Paes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helcio Duarte PereiraDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
José Marcelo Soriano VianaDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil. jmsviana@ufv.br.
Andréa Carla Bastos AndradeDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
Fabyano Fonseca E SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
Geísa Pinheiro PaesDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the relevance of relationship information on the identification of low heritability quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and on the genomic prediction of complex traits in human, animal and cross-pollinating populations. The simulation-based data sets included 50 samples of 1000 individuals of seven populations derived from a common population with linkage disequilibrium. The populations had non-inbred and inbred progeny structure (50 to 200) with varying number of members (5 to 20). The individuals were genotyped for 10,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotyped for a quantitative trait controlled by 10 QTLs and 90 minor genes showing dominance. The SNP density was 0.1 cM and the narrow sense heritability was 25%. The QTL heritabilities ranged from 1.1 to 2.9%. We applied mixed model approaches for both GWAS and genomic prediction using pedigree-based and genomic relationship matrices. For GWAS, the observed false discovery rate was kept below the significance level of 5%, the power of detection for the low heritability QTLs ranged from 14 to 50%, and the average bias between significant SNPs and a QTL ranged from less than 0.01 to 0.23 cM. The QTL detection power was consistently higher using genomic relationship matrix. Regardless of population and training set size, genomic prediction provided higher prediction accuracy of complex trait when compared to pedigree-based prediction. The accuracy of genomic prediction when there is relatedness between individuals in the training set and the reference population is much higher than the value for unrelated individuals.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsComputer SimulationGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticPedigreePlantsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideFalse discovery rateGenomic predictionMapping precisionPower of QTL detectionPrediction accuracy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.