Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29190003›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2018

p16 Immunohistochemistry in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using the E6H4 Antibody Clone: A Technical Method Study for Optimal Dilution.

James S Lewis, Jeremy Shelton, Krystle Lang Kuhs, Derek K Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James S LewisDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 3020D Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, TN, 37232-7415, USA. James.lewis@vanderbilt.edu.
Jeremy SheltonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 3020D Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, TN, 37232-7415, USA.
Krystle Lang KuhsDepartment of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Derek K SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
Vanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Physiology CenterU24DK059637 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WASSERMAN, DAVID H · 2001 to 2015
$14.9M
Human Papillomavirus-Specific Biomarkers for the Prediction of Oropharyngeal Cancer RecurrenceK07CA218247 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KUHS, KRYSTLE A. · 2018 to 2021
$594k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA218247NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK059637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine testing for p16 immunohistochemistry (with selective HPV-specific test use) has been recommended for clinical practice in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Data suggests that the E6H4 clone performs best for this purpose, yet no studies have evaluated the optimal antibody concentration for OPSCC testing. We evaluated three concentrations (undiluted, 1:5, and 1:10) of the primary antibody solution for E6H4 using tissue microarrays from a cohort of 199 OPSCC patients with a > 70% staining cutoff for positivity. Concordance was evaluated using percent agreement and Cohen's kappa. The concentrations were evaluated for sensitivity and specificity using high risk HPV RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) and also correlated with Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis. Inter-rater agreement was very high between p16 results at each concentration and also with RNA in situ hybridization (p < 0.0001 for all). Agreement between p16 undiluted and 1:5 dilution (agreement 98.2%; Kappa 0.943; p < 0.0001) was very high and between p16 undiluted and 1:10 dilution (agreement 79.2%; Kappa 0.512; p < 0.0001) much lower. Intensity of the staining did decrease with the 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions compared to undiluted, but not in a manner that obviously would change test interpretation or performance. Results suggest that the E6H4 antibody performs well at dilutions of up to 1:5 fold with a minor decrease in staining intensity, minimum loss of sensitivity, and no loss of specificity in OPSCC patients. This could result in reagent and cost savings.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16HumansImmunohistochemistryOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificitySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16AntibodyE6H4Human papillomavirusImmunohistochemistryOropharyngealP16Squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29190003
PMCPMC6232210
OpenAlexW2773329923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.