ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2018
Somatosensory evoked potentials after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurobehavioral and Electrophysiology in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.Neural plasticity · 2022Trial
- EOY summary 2018.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are used for neuroprognosis after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However decompressive craniectomy (DC), involving removal of a portion of the skull to alleviate elevated intracranial pressure, is associated with an increase in SSEP amplitude. Accordingly, SSEPs are not available for neuroprognosis over the hemisphere with DC. We aim to determine the degree to which SSEP amplitudes are increased in the absence of cranial bone. This will serve as a precursor for translation to clinically prognostic ranges. Intra-operative SSEPs were performed before and after bone flap replacement in 22 patients with severe TBI. SSEP measurements were also performed in a comparison non-traumatic group undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection. N20/P25 amplitudes and central conduction time were measured with the bone flap in (BI) and out (BO). Linear regressions, adjusting for skull thickness and study arm, were performed to evaluate the contribution of bone presence to SSEP amplitudes. Latencies were not different between BO or BI trials in either group. Mean N20/P25 amplitudes recorded with BO were statistically different (p = 0.0001) from BI in both cohorts, showing an approximate doubling in BO amplitudes. For contralateral-ipsilateral montages r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.