Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29189961›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2018

Feasibility of endoscopic resection using bipolar snare for nonampullary duodenal tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Kazuya Inoki, Takeshi Nakajima, Satoru Nonaka, Seiichiro Abe, Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Ichiro Oda, Masayoshi Yamada, Mizuki Takatsu, Hiroshi Yoshida and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuya InokiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi NakajimaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. tnakajim@ncc.go.jp.
Satoru NonakaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichiro AbeEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruhisa SuzukiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigetaka YoshinagaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro OdaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi YamadaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mizuki TakatsuDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi YoshidaPathology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiPathology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeki SekinePathology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichiro OheAdvanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of duodenal and colorectal tumours is important in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Endoscopic resection (ER) should be carefully performed because the risk of complications during or after (ER) of nonampullary duodenal tumours is higher than that of stomach or colorectal lesions in general. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of endoscopic resection using bipolar snare (ERB) for nonampullary duodenal tumours in FAP patients. Eleven FAP patients who underwent ERB for nonampullary duodenal tumours at our hospital between October 2013 and December 2016 were retrospectively analysed based on clinicopathological features. ER was generally indicated for endoscopically diagnosed tumours > 20 mm, biopsy-confirmed high-grade dysplasia or carcinomas > 10 mm, and multiple tumours. Nineteen endoscopic treatments were performed and 134 nonampullary duodenal tumours were resected. The median patient age at initial treatment was 40 years (range 20-64), and median size of the largest tumour in each procedure was 16 mm (range 9-40). Of the 101 pathologically evaluated lesions, 10 tumours were high-grade tubular adenomas, 87 were low-grade tubular adenomas, 1 was an adenocarcinoma, and 3 were non-neoplastic mucosal polyps. No intraoperative or delayed perforations were observed. Melena was encountered in one patient and managed without emergent endoscopic intervention. ERB for nonampullary duodenal tumours of FAP patients is feasible and effective, even for large lesions with high-grade dysplasia. Long-term outcomes of ERB, including local recurrence and prognosis, should be monitored.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultDuodenal NeoplasmsDuodenoscopyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBipolar snareDuodenal neoplasmsEndoscopic resectionFamilial adenomatous polyposisPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID29189961
OpenAlexW2771667039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.