ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2017
Blood-Based Protein Signatures for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood-based biomarkers of protein digestibility, utilization, and nitrogen excretion in animals: Concepts, evidence, and applications.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Early Cancer Detection: What's Going on and What's Next.MedComm · 2026Review
- Exploration of the application potential of serum multi-biomarker model in colorectal cancer screening.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Correlation of Repeat Measurements of 27 Candidate Protein Markers for Colorectal Cancer Screening Taken Three Years and Multiple Freeze-Thaw Cycles Apart.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening via Surface Markers of Circulating Tumor Cells.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Cancer diagnostics based on plasma protein biomarkers: hard times but great expectations.Molecular oncology · 2021Review
- Towards Novel Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Liquid Biopsy-Current Updates on Its Potential in Non-Invasive Detection, Prognosis and as a Predictive Marker.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A two-tiered targeted proteomics approach to identify pre-diagnostic biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Liquid biopsy for cancer management: a revolutionary but still limited new tool for precision medicine.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2020Review
- Tumor circulome in the liquid biopsies for cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Theranostics · 2020Review
- Diagnostic Value of Combinatorial Markers in Colorectal Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Multiplex screening of 275 plasma protein biomarkers to identify a signature for early detection of colorectal cancer.Molecular oncology · 2020Article
- Components of the full blood count as risk factors for colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Article
- Using serum placenta growth factor could improve the sensitivity of colorectal cancer screening in fecal occult blood negative population: A multicenter with independent cohort validation study.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- High-Throughput Omics and Statistical Learning Integration for the Discovery and Validation of Novel Diagnostic Signatures in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBlood-based proteins might be an attractive option for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but individually they are unlikely to achieve the diagnostic performance required for population based screening. We aimed at summarizing current evidence of diagnostic performance of signatures based on multiple proteins for early detection of CRC.
methodsA systematic literature review adhering to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) guidelines was performed. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for potentially relevant studies published until 28th August, 2017. Relevant studies were identified by predefined eligibility criteria. Estimates of indicators of diagnostic performance such as sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), along with information on validation and other key methodological procedures were extracted. Study quality was assessed by a QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) instrument tool.
resultsThirty six eligible studies with numbers of CRC cases ranging from 23 to 512 and the number of proteins included in signatures ranged from 3 to 13 were identified. Reported Youden's Index and AUC ranged from 0.19 to 0.95 and from 0.62 to 0.996, respectively. However most studies, especially those reporting better diagnostic performance, were conducted in clinical rather than screening setting and many studies lacked any internal or external validation of identified algorithm.
conclusionsBlood-based tests using signatures of multiple proteins may be a promising approach for non-invasive CRC screening. However, promising signatures identified in clinical settings still require rigorous evaluation in large studies conducted in true screening setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.