ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
A Denoising Method for Randomly Clustered Noise in ICCD Sensing Images Based on Hypergraph Cut and Down Sampling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transient 2D Junction Temperature Distribution Measurement by Short Pulse Driving and Gated Integration with Ordinary CCD Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensified charge-coupled device (ICCD) images are captured by ICCD sensors in extremely low-light conditions. They often contains spatially clustered noises and general filtering methods do not work well. We find that the scale of the clustered noise in ICCD sensing images is often much smaller than that of the true structural information. Then the clustered noise can be identified by properly down-sampling and then up-sampling the ICCD sensing image and comparing it to the noisy image. Based on this finding, we present a denoising algorithm to remove the randomly clustered noise in ICCD images. First, we over-segment the ICCD image into a set of flat patches, and each patch contains very little structural information. Second, we classify the patches into noisy patches and noise-free patches based on the hypergraph cut method. Then the noise-free patches are easily recovered by the general block-matching and 3D filtering (BM3D) algorithm, since they often do not contain the clustered noise. The noisy patches are recovered by subtracting the identified clustered noise from the noisy patches. After that, we could get the whole recovered ICCD image. Finally, the quality of the recovered ICCD image is further improved by diminishing the remaining sparse noise with robust principal component analysis. Experiments are conducted on a set of ICCD images and compared with four existing denoising algorithms, which shows that the proposed algorithm removes well the randomly clustered noise and preserves the true textural information in the ICCD sensing images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.