Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29189576›Full record

ArticleMedical care2018

Predicting High Health Care Resource Utilization in a Single-payer Public Health Care System: Development and Validation of the High Resource User Population Risk Tool.

Laura C Rosella, Kathy Kornas, Zhan Yao, Douglas G Manuel, Catherine Bornbaum, Randall Fransoo, Therese Stukel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can patient-reported data improve predictions about who will be a high-need, high-cost patient in British Columbia?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Medical Complexity Mediates Healthcare Resource Use in the Socially Vulnerable.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives · 2022
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Downstream health impacts of employment losses during the COVID-19 pandemic.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura C RosellaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
Kathy KornasDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
Zhan YaoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.
Douglas G ManuelInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences.
Catherine BornbaumDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
Randall FransooManitoba Centre for Health Policy.
Therese StukelDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.

Funding

CIHR FRN 141803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large proportion of health care spending is incurred by a small proportion of the population. Population-based health planning tools that consider both the clinical and upstream determinants of high resource users (HRU) of the health system are lacking.

objectiveTo develop and validate the High Resource User Population Risk Tool (HRUPoRT), a predictive model of adults that will become the top 5% of health care users over a 5-year period, based on self-reported clinical, sociodemographic, and health behavioral predictors in population survey data. RESEARCH

designThe HRUPoRT model was developed in a prospective cohort design using the combined 2005 and 2007/2008 Canadian Community Health Surveys (CCHS) (N=58,617), and validated using the external 2009/2010 CCHS cohort (N=28,721). Health care utilization for each of the 5 years following CCHS interview date were determined by applying a person-centered costing algorithm to the linked health administrative databases. Discrimination and calibration of the model were assessed using c-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) χ statistic.

resultsThe best prediction model for 5-year transition to HRU status included 12 predictors and had good discrimination (c-statistic=0.8213) and calibration (HL χ=18.71) in the development cohort. The model performed similarly in the validation cohort (c-statistic=0.8171; HL χ=19.95). The strongest predictors in the HRUPoRT model were age, perceived general health, and body mass index.

conclusionsHRUPoRT can accurately project the proportion of individuals in the population that will become a HRU over 5 years. HRUPoRT can be applied to inform health resource planning and prevention strategies at the community level.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesPublic HealthResource AllocationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID29189576
PMCPMC6143224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.