ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography
Quantification of the Effect of Shuttling on Computed Tomography Perfusion Parameters by Investigation of Aortic Inputs on Different Table Positions From Shuttle-Mode Scans of Lung and Liver Tumors.
Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to quantify the effect of shuttling on computed tomography perfusion (CTp) parameters derived from shuttle-mode body CT images using aortic inputs from different table positions.
methodsAxial shuttle-mode CT scans were acquired from 6 patients (10 phases, 2 nonoverlapping table positions 1.4 seconds apart) after contrast agent administration. Artifacts resulting from the shuttling motion were corrected with nonrigid registration before computing CTp maps from 4 aortic levels chosen from the most superior and inferior slices of each table position scan. The effect of shuttling on CTp parameters was estimated by mean differences in mappings obtained from aortic inputs in different table positions. Shuttling effect was also quantified using 95% limits of agreement of CTp parameter differences within-table and between-table aortic positions from the interaortic mean CTp values.
resultsBlood flow, permeability surface, and hepatic arterial fraction differences were insignificant (P > 0.05) for both within-table and between-table comparisons. The 95% limits of agreement for within-table blood volume (BV) value deviations obtained from lung tumor regions were less than 4.7% (P = 0.18) compared with less than 12.2% (P = 0.003) for between-table BV value deviations. The 95% limits of agreement of within-table deviations for liver tumor regions were less than 1.9% (P = 0.55) for BV and less than 3.2% (P = 0.23) for mean transit time, whereas between-table BV and mean transit time deviations were less than 11.7% (P < 0.01) and less than 14.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. Values for normal liver tissue regions were concordant.
conclusionsComputed tomography perfusion parameters acquired from aortic levels within-table positions generally yielded higher agreement than mappings obtained from aortic levels between-table positions indicating differences due to shuttling effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.