Trial reportJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2018
Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.
Trial report in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of Placebo Response with Effect Size in Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of antidepressant medication for adolescent depression: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Factors Related to Placebo Response in Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-regression Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2023Pooled it
- New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2018Trial
- Article
- Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Children: 12-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.JAACAP open · 2025Article
- Review: Child Psychiatry in the Era of Genomics: The Promise of Translational Genetics Research for the Clinic.JAACAP open · 2025Review
- Exploring perceived barriers and attitudes in young adults towards antidepressant pharmacotherapy, including the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing to optimize prescription practices.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressant drugs in treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022Article
- Pediatric Psychopharmacology for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2022Review
- Editorial: Beyond Red Light, Green Light: Examining the Role of Pharmacogenomics in Evidence-Based Care in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2022Article
- Fluoxetine in the Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Duty to Warn: Antidepressant Black Box Suicidality Warning Is Empirically Justified.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Review
- New Somatic Treatments for Child and Adolescent Depression.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2019Article
- Short- and Long-Term Antidepressant Clinical Trials for Major Depressive Disorder in Youth: Findings and Concerns.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25-50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD).
methodsOutpatient children (7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8-week treatment with placebo, desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/d based on baseline weight), or fluoxetine (20 mg/d). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy endpoints included week 8 Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and response (CGI-I ≤ 2). Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale.
resultsThe safety population included 339 patients (children, n = 130; adolescents, n = 209). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, did not statistically separate from placebo, for either desvenlafaxine (adjusted mean [standard error] change, -22.6 [1.17]) or fluoxetine (-24.8 [1.17]; placebo, -23.1 [1.18]). Week 8 CGI-I response rates were significantly greater for fluoxetine (78.2%; p = 0.017) than for placebo (62.6%); desvenlafaxine (68.7%) did not differ from placebo. Other secondary outcomes were consistent with those obtained with CDRS-R. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable among treatment groups (desvenlafaxine, 60.0%; placebo, 70.5%; and fluoxetine, 64.3%).
conclusionDesvenlafaxine did not demonstrate efficacy for treating MDD in children and adolescents in this trial. Because neither desvenlafaxine nor the reference medication, fluoxetine, demonstrated a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary endpoint, this was considered a failed trial and no efficacy conclusions can be drawn. Desvenlafaxine 25-50 mg/d was generally safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.