Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29189042›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI.

Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya, Harbir S Sidhu, Nikolaos Dikaios, Edward W Johnston, Lucy Am Simmons, Alex Freeman, Alexander Ps Kirkham, Hashim U Ahmed, Shonit Punwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Wolfson House , London , UK.
Harbir S Sidhu1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Wolfson House , London , UK.
Nikolaos Dikaios1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Wolfson House , London , UK.
Edward W Johnston1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Wolfson House , London , UK.
Lucy Am Simmons3 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London , London , UK.
Alex Freeman4 Department of Pathology, University College London Hospital , London , UK.
Alexander Ps Kirkham2 Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital , London , UK.
Hashim U Ahmed3 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London , London , UK.
Shonit Punwani1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Wolfson House , London , UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Medical Research Council G0701302Medical Research Council G1002509Prostate Cancer UK PG13-025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone (PZ) multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) studies are classifiable by prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System version 2 (PI-RADS_v2) rescoring and morphological MRI features.

methodsMen with maximum Likert-score 3/5 within their PZ were retrospectively selected from 330 patients who prospectively underwent prostate mpMRI (3 T) without an endorectal coil, followed by 20-zone transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies +/- focal lesion-targeted biopsy. PSAD was calculated using pre-biopsy PSA and MRI-derived volume. Two readers A and B independently assessed included men with both Likert-assessment and PI-RADS_v2. Both readers then classified mpMRI morphological features in consensus. Men were divided into two groups: significant cancer (≥ Gleason 3 + 4) or insignificant cancer (≤ Gleason 3 + 3)/no cancer. Comparisons between groups were made separately for PSA & PSAD using Mann-Whitney test and morphological descriptors with Fisher's exact test. PI-RADS_v2 and Likert-assessment were descriptively compared and percentage inter-reader agreement calculated.

results76 males were eligible for PSA & PSAD analyses, 71 for PI-RADS scoring, and 67 for morphological assessment (excluding significant image artefacts). Unlike PSA (p = 0.915), PSAD was statistically different (p = 0.004) between the significant [median: 0.19 ng ml

conclusionPSAD may categorize presence of significant cancer in patients with Likert-scored 3/5 PZ mpMRI findings. Advances in knowledge: PSAD may be used in indeterminate PZ mpMRI to guide decisions between biopsy vs monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29189042
PMCPMC5965471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.