Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188746›Full record

ArticleCognitive neuropsychology2017

Can neuroimaging help aphasia researchers? Addressing generalizability, variability, and interpretability.

Idan A Blank, Swathi Kiran, Evelina Fedorenko

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neuropsychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The cerebellar components of the human language network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distinct neural correlates of linguistic demand and non-linguistic demand.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Idan A Blanka McGovern Institute for Brain Research , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , MA , USA.
Swathi Kiranb Department of Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, Aphasia Research Laboratory , Sargent College, Boston University , Boston , MA , USA.
Evelina Fedorenkoc Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Charlestown , MA , USA.
Boston University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
fMRI investigations of the functional architecture of the language systemR00HD057522 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA · 2014 to 2016
$738k
fMRI investigations of the functional architecture of the language systemK99HD057522 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA · 2009 to 2010
$160k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD057522NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD057522NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies of individuals with brain damage seek to link brain structure and activity to cognitive impairments, spontaneous recovery, or treatment outcomes. To date, such studies have relied on the critical assumption that a given anatomical landmark corresponds to the same functional unit(s) across individuals. However, this assumption is fallacious even across neurologically healthy individuals. Here, we discuss the severe implications of this issue, and argue for an approach that circumvents it, whereby: (i) functional brain regions are defined separately for each subject using fMRI, allowing for inter-individual variability in their precise location; (ii) the response profile of these subject-specific regions are characterized using various other tasks; and (iii) the results are averaged across individuals, guaranteeing generalizabliity. This method harnesses the complementary strengths of single-case studies and group studies, and it eliminates the need for post hoc "reverse inference" from anatomical landmarks back to cognitive operations, thus improving data interpretability.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingResearch PersonnelAphasiaBiomedical ResearchBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosciencesReproducibility of ResultsAphasiafMRIfunctional localizationgroup studiesindividual differences

Identifiers

PMID29188746
PMCPMC6157596
OpenAlexW2774559876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.