Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188544›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2018

Keystrokes, Mouse Clicks, and Gazing at the Computer: How Physician Interaction with the EHR Affects Patient Participation.

Richard L Street, Lin Liu, Neil J Farber, Yunan Chen, Alan Calvitti, Nadir Weibel, Mark T Gabuzda, Kristin Bell, Barbara Gray, Steven Rick and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of Emerging Technologies on Outpatient Care Quality: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. While the Chatbot's Away, the Mice Will Play.Frontiers in digital health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Richard L StreetFrom Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. r-street@tamu.edu.
Lin LiuFrom University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Neil J FarberFrom University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Yunan ChenUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Alan CalvittiVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nadir WeibelFrom University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mark T GabuzdaVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kristin BellVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Barbara GrayVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Steven RickVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Shazia AshfaqVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Zia AghaFrom University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
VA San Diego Healthcare System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USWest Health · US

Funding

Quantifying Electronic Medical Record Usability to Improve Clinical WorkflowR01HS021290 · AHRQ · VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN/SAN DIEGO · PI AGHA, ZIA · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS021290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence is mixed regarding how physicians' use of the electronic health record (EHR) affects communication in medical encounters.

objectiveTo investigate whether the different ways physicians interact with the computer (mouse clicks, key strokes, and gaze) vary in their effects on patient participation in the consultation, physicians' efforts to facilitate patient involvement, and silence.

designCross-sectional, observational study of video and event recordings of primary care and specialty consultations.

participantsThirty-two physicians and 217 patients. MAIN MEASURES: Predictor variables included measures of physician interaction with the EHR (mouse clicks, key strokes, gaze). Outcome measures included active patient participation (asking questions, stating preferences, expressing concerns), physician facilitation of patient involvement (partnership-building and supportive talk), and silence. KEY

resultsPatients were less active participants in consultations in which physicians engaged in more keyboard activity (b = -0.002, SE = 0.001, p = 0.02). More physician gaze at the computer was associated with more silence in the encounter (b = 0.21, SE = 0.09, p = 0.02). Physicians' facilitative communication, which predicted more active patient participation (b = 0.65, SE = 0.14, p < 0.001), was not related to EHR activity measures.

conclusionsPatients may be more reluctant to actively participate in medical encounters when physicians are more physically engaged with the computer (e.g., keyboard activity) than when their behavior is less demonstrative (e.g., gazing at EHR). Using easy to deploy communication tactics (e.g., asking about a patient's thoughts and concerns, social conversation) while working on the computer can help physicians engage patients as well as maintain conversational flow.

Indexed as

CommunicationElectronic Health RecordsFixation, OcularPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Participation

Identifiers

PMID29188544
PMCPMC5880755
OpenAlexW2769692290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.