Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188538›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

Analytical ultracentrifugation in structural biology.

Satoru Unzai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Satoru UnzaiDepartment of Frontier Bioscience, Faculty of Bioscience and Applied Chemistry, Hosei University, 3-7-2, Kajino-cho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan. satoru.unzai.61@hosei.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers in the field of structural biology, especially X-ray crystallography and protein nuclear magnetic resonance, are interested in knowing as much as possible about the state of their target protein in solution. Not only is this knowledge relevant to studies of biological function, it also facilitates determination of a protein structure using homogeneous monodisperse protein samples. A researcher faced with a new protein to study will have many questions even after that protein has been purified. Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) can provide all of this information readily from a small sample in a non-destructive way, without the need for labeling, enabling structure determination experiments without any wasting time and material on uncharacterized samples. In this article, I use examples to illustrate how AUC can contribute to protein structural analysis. Integrating information from a variety of biophysical experimental methods, such as X-ray crystallography, small angle X-ray scattering, electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry, AUC allows a more complete understanding of the structure and function of biomacromolecules.

Indexed as

AUCCrystallographyInteractionProtein

Identifiers

PMID29188538
PMCPMC5899701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.