Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188484›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model.

Christina Jerosch-Herold, Rachel Chester, Lee Shepstone, Joshua I Vincent, Joy C MacDermid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Instability Scale Using the Rasch Model.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina Jerosch-HeroldSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK. c.jerosch-herold@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0525-1282
Rachel ChesterSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Lee ShepstoneNorwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Joshua I VincentSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Joy C MacDermidSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

Funding

Department of Health CAT CDRF 10-008Department of Health SRF-2012-05-119Research Trainees Coordinating Centre CAT-CDRF 10-008Research Trainees Coordinating Centre SRF-2012-05-119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) has been extensively evaluated for its psychometric properties using classical test theory (CTT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate its structural validity using Rasch model analysis.

methodsResponses to the SPADI from 1030 patients referred for physiotherapy with shoulder pain and enrolled in a prospective cohort study were available for Rasch model analysis. Overall fit, individual person and item fit, response format, dependence, unidimensionality, targeting, reliability and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined.

resultsThe SPADI pain subscale initially demonstrated a misfit due to DIF by age and gender. After iterative analysis it showed good fit to the Rasch model with acceptable targeting and unidimensionality (overall fit Chi-square statistic 57.2, p = 0.1; mean item fit residual 0.19 (1.5) and mean person fit residual 0.44 (1.1); person separation index (PSI) of 0.83. The disability subscale however shows significant misfit due to uniform DIF even after iterative analyses were used to explore different solutions to the sources of misfit (overall fit (Chi-square statistic 57.2, p = 0.1); mean item fit residual 0.54 (1.26) and mean person fit residual 0.38 (1.0); PSI 0.84).

conclusionsRasch Model analysis of the SPADI has identified some strengths and limitations not previously observed using CTT methods. The SPADI should be treated as two separate subscales. The SPADI is a widely used outcome measure in clinical practice and research; however, the scores derived from it must be interpreted with caution. The pain subscale fits the Rasch model expectations well. The disability subscale does not fit the Rasch model and its current format does not meet the criteria for true interval-level measurement required for use as a primary endpoint in clinical trials. Clinicians should therefore exercise caution when interpreting score changes on the disability subscale and attempt to compare their scores to age- and sex-stratified data.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignShoulder PainSurveys and QuestionnairesPsychometricsRasch modelShoulder pain and disability index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.