ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018
[Quality indicators for surgery of rectal cancer : Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for quality].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Robot-assisted rectal resections-Scoping review for level 1a evidence and retrospective analysis of in-clinic data].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Safety of anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery in octogenarians: a prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.BJS open · 2021Article
- [Case load and quality indicators in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Article
- Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The definition of valid quality indicators is an essential task of medical self-administration and quality assurance. Based on the literature and the results of the Study, Documentation, and Quality Center (StuDoQ) Rectal Cancer Registry, we suggest the following QIs: rate of circumferential resection margin (CRM) positive resected material, rate of anastomotic leak in patients with anastomoses, rate of abdominal wound healing disorders and rate of patients with newly established permanent urinary diversion. Additionally, a new marker, the MTL30, which subsumes patient death within 30 days after the index operation, patient transfer to another acute hospital within 30 days after the index operation or a length of inpatient hospital stay of more than 30 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29188353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.