Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188198›Full record

ArticleProstate international2017

Evaluation of the changing landscape of prostate cancer diagnosis and management from 2005 to 2016.

Kirsten R Carlaw, Henry H Woo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kirsten R CarlawSydney Adventist Hospital Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Henry H WooSydney Adventist Hospital Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproaches to prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment have evolved significantly over past decades. There has been an increasing focus on minimizing overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant PCa. The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in the diagnostic approach and initial treatment strategy that has evolved over time in an Australian urological private practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsMen with newly diagnosed PCa were identified from the private practice electronic and paper medical records from 2005 to 2016 and data was consolidated into six groups of 2-year intervals. Diagnostic strategy was analyzed with particular reference to the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scan and

resultsChart review identified 839 men who had a mean age of 65.8 years. In 2011-2012, prebiopsy mpMRI scan was introduced. Its uptake correlated with a decrease in numbers of men diagnosed with low risk cancer (r = -0.80,

conclusionPrebiopsy mpMRI has been associated with an increased proportion of newly diagnosed men having clinically significant PCa. Over time,

Indexed as

Active SurveillanceMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyProstate cancerProstatectomyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29188198
PMCPMC5693456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.