Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188144›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2017

An efficient pipeline to generate data for studies in plastid population genomics and phylogeography.

Brendan F Kohrn, Jessica M Persinger, Mitchell B Cruzan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brendan F KohrnDepartment of Biology, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 USA.
Jessica M PersingerDepartment of Biology, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 USA.
Mitchell B CruzanDepartment of Biology, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 USA.
Portland State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premise of the studySeed dispersal contributes to gene flow and is responsible for colonization of new sites and range expansion. Sequencing chloroplast haplotypes offers a way to estimate contributions of seed dispersal to population genetic structure and enables studies of population history. Whole-genome sequencing is expensive, but resources can be conserved by pooling samples. Unfortunately, haplotype associations among single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are lost in pooled samples, and treating SNP allele frequencies as independent markers provides biased estimates of genetic structure.

methodsWe developed sampling methodologies and an application, CallHap, that uses a least-squares algorithm to evaluate the fit between observed and predicted SNP allele frequencies from pooled samples based on haplotype network phylogeny structure, thus enabling pooling for chloroplast sequencing for large-scale studies of chloroplast genomic variation. This method was tested using artificially constructed test networks and pools, and pooled samples of

resultsCallHap reliably recovered network topologies and haplotype frequencies from pooled samples. DISCUSSION: The CallHap pipeline allows for the efficient use of resources for estimation of genetic structure for studies using nonrecombining haplotypes such as intraspecific variation in chloroplast, mitochondrial, bacterial, or viral DNA.

Indexed as

chloroplast genomegene flowhaplotypesphylogeographypopulation genomicssingle-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Identifiers

PMID29188144
PMCPMC5703179
OpenAlexW2768525507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.