Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188127›Full record

ArticlePLoS currents2017

Enhancing Ebola Virus Disease Surveillance and Prevention in Counties Without Confirmed Cases in Rural Liberia: Experiences from Sinoe County During the Flare-up in Monrovia, April to June, 2016.

Vera Darling Weah, John S Doedeh, Samson Q Wiah, Emmanuel Nyema, Siafa Lombeh, Jeremias Naiene

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS currents, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rigorous surveillance is necessary for high confidence in end-of-outbreak declarations for Ebola and other infectious diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vera Darling WeahHealth Promotion Division, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Monrovia, Liberia.
John S DoedehCounty Health Team, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Greenville City, Sinoe County, Liberia.
Samson Q WiahCounty Health Team, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Greenville City, Sinoe County, Liberia.
Emmanuel NyemaWorld Health Organization, Greenville City, Sinoe County, Liberia.
Siafa LombehWorld Health Organization, Greenville City, Sinoe County, Liberia.
Jeremias NaieneWorld Health Organization, Greenville City, Sinoe County, Liberia.
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare · TZMinistry of Health and Social Welfare · LR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the flare-ups of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in Liberia, Sinoe County reactivated the multi-sectorial EVD control strategy in order to be ready to respond to the eventual reintroduction of cases. This paper describes the impacts of the interventions implemented in Sinoe County during the last flare-up in Monrovia, from April 1 to June 9, 2016, using the resources provided during the original outbreak that ended a year ago.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive study to describe the key interventions implemented in Sinoe County, the capacity available, the implications for the reactivation of the multi-sectoral EVD control strategy, and the results of the same. We also conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze the impact of the interventions on the surveillance and on infection prevention and control (IPC).

resultsThe attrition of the staff trained during the original outbreak was low, and most of the supplies, equipment, and infrastructure from the original outbreak remained available. With an additional USD 1755, improvements were observed in the IPC indicators of triage, which increased from a mean of 60% at the first assessment to 77% (P=0.002). Additionally, personnel/staff training improved from 78% to 89% (P=0.04). The percentage of EVD death alerts per expected deaths investigated increased from 26% to 63% (P<0.0001). DISCUSSION: The low attrition of the trained staff and the availability of most supplies, equipment, and infrastructure made the reactivation of the multi-sectoral EVD control strategy fast and affordable. The improvement of the EVD surveillance was possibly affected by the community engagement activities, awareness and mentoring of the health workers, and improved availability of clinicians in the facilities during the flare-up. The community engagement may contribute to the report of community-based events, specifically community deaths. The mentoring of the staff during the supportive supervisions also contributed to improve the IPC indicators.

Indexed as

assessmentcommunity-based eventscommunity deathscommunity engagementcontrolEbola Virus DiseaseEnhancing surveillanceEVDflare-upinfection prevention and controlinfectious diseasesIPCLiberiaOutbreakpreparednesspreventionpublic healthSinoe Countystaff attritionSurveillanceWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID29188127
PMCPMC5693337
OpenAlexW2950367965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.