Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188086›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

Muhammad Mohsin Qureshi, Joshua Brake, Hee-Jae Jeon, Haowen Ruan, Yan Liu, Abdul Mohaimen Safi, Tae Joong Eom, Changhuei Yang, Euiheon Chung

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cranial and Spinal Window Preparation forExperimental neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Mohsin QureshiDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-Ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61005, South Korea.
Joshua BrakeDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Hee-Jae JeonDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-Ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61005, South Korea.
Haowen RuanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Yan LiuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Abdul Mohaimen SafiDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-Ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61005, South Korea.
Tae Joong EomAdvanced Photonics Research Institute, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-Ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61005, South Korea.
Changhuei YangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Euiheon ChungDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Institute of Integrated Technology (IIT), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-Ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61005, South Korea.
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology · KRCalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Time-Reversal Optical Focusing for Noninvasive OptogeneticsU01NS090577 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRADINARU, VIVIANA, YANG, CHANGHUEI · 2014 to 2016
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strong optical scattering of biological tissue confounds our ability to focus light deeply into the brain beyond depths of a few hundred microns. This challenge can be potentially overcome by exploiting wavefront shaping techniques which allow light to be focused through or inside scattering media. However, these techniques require the scattering medium to be static, as changes in the arrangement of the scatterers between the wavefront recording and playback steps reduce the fidelity of the focus that is formed. Furthermore, as the thickness of the scattering medium increases, the influence of the dynamic nature becomes more severe due to the growing number of scattering events experienced by each photon. In this paper, by examining the scattering dynamics in the mouse brain

Indexed as

(030.6140) Speckle(170.3660) Light propagation in tissues(170.7050) Turbid media

Identifiers

PMID29188086
PMCPMC5695936
OpenAlexW2761049503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.