Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29188029›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2017

Distributional benefits of tobacco tax and smoke-free workplaces in China: A modeling study.

Stéphane Verguet, Gillian Tarr, Cindy L Gauvreau, Sujata Mishra, Prabhat Jha, Lingrui Liu, Yue Xiao, Yingpeng Qiu, Kun Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cost-Effectiveness of Four Tobacco Control Interventions in Mongolia.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in Smoking Prevalence and Intensity between 2010 and 2018: Implications for Tobacco Control in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stéphane VerguetDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gillian TarrDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Cindy L GauvreauCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sujata MishraCenter for Global Health Research, Saint Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Prabhat JhaCenter for Global Health Research, Saint Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lingrui LiuDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yue XiaoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Yingpeng QiuChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
Kun ZhaoChina National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China.
China National Health Development Research Center · CNHarvard Global Health Institute · USUniversity of Toronto · CACanadian Partnership Against Cancer · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Biostatistics, Epidemiologic & Bioinformatic Training in Environmental HealthT32ES015459 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI June T. Spector · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco taxation and smoke-free workplaces reduce smoking, tobacco-related premature deaths and associated out-of-pocket health care expenditures. We examine the distributional consequences of a price increase in tobacco products through an excise tax hike, and of an implementation of smoke-free workplaces, in China.

methodsWe use extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA) to evaluate, across income quintiles of the male population (the large majority of Chinese smokers), the premature deaths averted, the change in tax revenues generated, and the financial risk protection procured (eg, poverty cases averted, defined as the number of individuals no longer facing tobacco-related out-of-pocket expenditures for disease treatment, that would otherwise impoverish them), that would follow a 75% increase in cigarette prices through substantial increments in excise tax fully passed onto consumers, and a nationwide total implementation of workplace smoking bans.

resultsA 75% increase in cigarette prices would avert about 24 million premature deaths among the current Chinese male population, with a third among the bottom income quintile, increase additional tax revenues by US$ 46 billion annually, and prevent around 9 million poverty cases, 19% of which among the bottom income quintile. Implementation of smoking bans in workplaces would avert about 12 million premature deaths, with a fifth among the bottom income quintile, decrease tax revenues by US$ 7 billion annually, and prevent around 4 million poverty cases, 12% of which among the bottom income quintile.

conclusionsIncreased excise taxes on tobacco products and workplace smoking bans can procure large health and economic benefits to the Chinese population, especially among the poor.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyTaxesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMortality, Premature

Identifiers

PMID29188029
PMCPMC5681709
OpenAlexW2767884390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.