ArticleTheranostics2017
Optimizing fresh specimen staining for rapid identification of tumor biomarkers during surgery.
Article in Theranostics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-body fluorescence cryotomography identifies a fast-acting, high-contrast, durable contrast agent for fluorescence-guided surgery.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing the efficacy of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for tumor margin identification in breast conserving surgery.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Evaluating Receptor-Specific Fresh Specimen Staining for Tumor Margin Detection in Clinical Breast Specimens.Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
- Dual probe difference specimen imaging for prostate cancer margin assessment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- OregonFluor enables quantitative intracellular paired agent imaging to assess drug target availability in live cells and tissues.Nature chemistry · 2023Article
- Article
- TRIPODD: a Novel Fluorescence Imaging Platform for In Situ Quantification of Drug Distribution and Therapeutic Response.Molecular imaging and biology · 2021Article
- Clinically relevant dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI) protocol for freshly resected breast cancer specimen staining.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- A method for validating depth-resolved biodistributions in topically-stained specimen with multi-channel fluorescence cryo-imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Fluorescent Imaging forProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- Intracellular paired agent imaging enables improved evaluation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor target engagement.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- Topical dual-probe staining using quantum dot-labeled antibodies for identifying tumor biomarkers in fresh specimens.PloS one · 2020Article
- Assessment of human pancreas cancer tissue and precursor lesions via a fluorophore with inherent PDAC selectivity.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2019Article
- Fluorescence Guidance in Surgical Oncology: Challenges, Opportunities, and Translation.Molecular imaging and biology · 2019Review
- Exploiting heat shock protein expression to develop a non-invasive diagnostic tool for breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Modeling the binding and diffusion of receptor-targeted nanoparticles topically applied on fresh tissue specimens.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Effect of staining temperature on topical dual stain imaging of tissue specimens for tumor identification.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
- Diagnostic performance of receptor-specific surgical specimen staining correlates with receptor expression level.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Receptor-Specific Surgical Specimen Staining Correlate with Receptor Expression Level.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePositive margin status due to incomplete removal of tumor tissue during breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a prevalent diagnosis usually requiring a second surgical procedure. These follow-up procedures increase the risk of morbidity and delay the use of adjuvant therapy; thus, significant efforts are underway to develop new intraoperative strategies for margin assessment to eliminate re-excision procedures. One strategy under development uses topical application of dual probe staining and a fluorescence imaging strategy termed dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI). DDSI uses a receptor-targeted fluorescent probe and an untargeted, spectrally-distinct fluorescent companion imaging agent topically applied to fresh resected specimens, where the fluorescence from each probe is imaged and a normalized difference image is computed to identify tumor-target distribution in the specimen margins. While previous reports suggested this approach is a promising new tool for surgical guidance, advancing the approach into the clinic requires methodical protocol optimization and further validation.
methodsIn the present study, we used breast cancer xenografts and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate a wide range of staining and imaging parameters, and completed a prospective validation study on multiple tumor phenotypes with different target expression. Imaging fluorophore-probe pair, concentration, and incubation times were systematically optimized using n=6 tissue specimen replicates per staining condition. Resulting tumor vs. normal adipose tissue diagnostic performance were reported and staining patterns were validated via receptor specific immunohistochemistry colocalization. Optimal staining conditions were tested in receptor positive and receptor negative cohorts to confirm specificity.
resultsThe optimal staining conditions were found to be a one minute stain in a 200 nM probe solution (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.97), where the choice of fluorescent label combination did not significantly affect the diagnostic performance. Using an optimal threshold value determined from ROC curve analysis on a training data set, a prospective study on xenografts resulted in an AUC=0.95 for receptor positive tumors and an AUC = 0.50 for receptor negative (control) tumors, confirming the diagnostic performance of this novel imaging technique.
conclusionsDDSI provides a robust, molecularly specific imaging methodology for identifying tumor tissue over benign mammary adipose tissue. Using a dual probe imaging strategy, nonspecific accumulation of targeted probe was corrected for and tumor vs. normal tissue diagnostic potential was improved, circumventing difficulties with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.