Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29187899›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2017

Optimizing fresh specimen staining for rapid identification of tumor biomarkers during surgery.

Connor W Barth, Jasmin M Schaefer, Vincent M Rossi, Scott C Davis, Summer L Gibbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fluorescent Imaging forProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  12. Intracellular paired agent imaging enables improved evaluation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor target engagement.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of staining temperature on topical dual stain imaging of tissue specimens for tumor identification.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnostic Performance of Receptor-Specific Surgical Specimen Staining Correlate with Receptor Expression Level.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Connor W BarthBiomedical Engineering Department.
Jasmin M SchaeferBiomedical Engineering Department.
Vincent M RossiThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
Scott C DavisThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755.
Summer L GibbsBiomedical Engineering Department.

Funding

Multi-probe fluorescence imaging for rapid intra-operative tumor margin assessmentR01CA188491 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI DAVIS, SCOTT C · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePositive margin status due to incomplete removal of tumor tissue during breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a prevalent diagnosis usually requiring a second surgical procedure. These follow-up procedures increase the risk of morbidity and delay the use of adjuvant therapy; thus, significant efforts are underway to develop new intraoperative strategies for margin assessment to eliminate re-excision procedures. One strategy under development uses topical application of dual probe staining and a fluorescence imaging strategy termed dual probe difference specimen imaging (DDSI). DDSI uses a receptor-targeted fluorescent probe and an untargeted, spectrally-distinct fluorescent companion imaging agent topically applied to fresh resected specimens, where the fluorescence from each probe is imaged and a normalized difference image is computed to identify tumor-target distribution in the specimen margins. While previous reports suggested this approach is a promising new tool for surgical guidance, advancing the approach into the clinic requires methodical protocol optimization and further validation.

methodsIn the present study, we used breast cancer xenografts and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate a wide range of staining and imaging parameters, and completed a prospective validation study on multiple tumor phenotypes with different target expression. Imaging fluorophore-probe pair, concentration, and incubation times were systematically optimized using n=6 tissue specimen replicates per staining condition. Resulting tumor vs. normal adipose tissue diagnostic performance were reported and staining patterns were validated via receptor specific immunohistochemistry colocalization. Optimal staining conditions were tested in receptor positive and receptor negative cohorts to confirm specificity.

resultsThe optimal staining conditions were found to be a one minute stain in a 200 nM probe solution (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.97), where the choice of fluorescent label combination did not significantly affect the diagnostic performance. Using an optimal threshold value determined from ROC curve analysis on a training data set, a prospective study on xenografts resulted in an AUC=0.95 for receptor positive tumors and an AUC = 0.50 for receptor negative (control) tumors, confirming the diagnostic performance of this novel imaging technique.

conclusionsDDSI provides a robust, molecularly specific imaging methodology for identifying tumor tissue over benign mammary adipose tissue. Using a dual probe imaging strategy, nonspecific accumulation of targeted probe was corrected for and tumor vs. normal tissue diagnostic potential was improved, circumventing difficulties with

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFluorescent DyesHumansMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMastectomy, SegmentalMCF-7 CellsMiceMice, NudeSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingSurgery, Computer-AssistedBiomarkers, TumorFluorescent Dyesbreast cancerbreast conserving surgerydual probe difference specimen imagingdual probe imagingfluorescenceimage-guided surgerytumor margin assessment

Identifiers

PMID29187899
PMCPMC5706095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.