ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018
I
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-scale model of neural entrainment by transcranial alternating current stimulation in realistic cortical anatomy.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on Spike train correlation in two-compartment model neurons.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- Effects of AC induced electric fields on neuronal firing sensitivity and activity patterns.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Frequency-domain analysis of membrane polarization in two-compartment model neurons with weak alternating electric fields.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Neurophysiological mechanisms of transcranial alternating current stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Excitatory and inhibitory effects of HCN channel modulation on excitability of layer V pyramidal cells.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains alpha oscillations by preferential phase synchronization of fast-spiking cortical neurons to stimulation waveform.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Effects ofJournal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Age-Dependent Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Skill Consolidation.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
- Implantable Direct Current Neural Modulation: Theory, Feasibility, and Efficacy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Differential polarization of cortical pyramidal neuron dendrites through weak extracellular fields.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Temporal interference stimulation targets deep brain regions by modulating neural oscillations.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) modulates brain dynamics using weak electric fields. Given the pathological changes in brain network oscillations in neurological and psychiatric illnesses, using alternating electric field waveforms that engage rhythmic activity has been proposed as a targeted, network-level treatment approach. Previous studies have investigated the effects of electric fields at the neuronal level. However, the biophysical basis of the cellular response to electric fields has remained limited. Here, we characterized the frequency-dependent response of different compartments in a layer V pyramidal neuron to exogenous electric fields to dissect the relative contributions of voltage-gated ion channels and neuronal morphology. Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.