ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018
Model of a bilateral Brown-type central pattern generator for symmetric and asymmetric locomotion.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Control signal dimensionality depends on limb dynamics.PloS one · 2025Article
- State-dependent rhythmogenesis and frequency control in a half-center locomotor CPG.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Analytical CPG model driven by limb velocity input generates accurate temporal locomotor dynamics.PeerJ · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The coordinated activity of muscles is produced in part by spinal rhythmogenic neural circuits, termed central pattern generators (CPGs). A classical CPG model is a system of coupled oscillators that transform locomotor drive into coordinated and gait-specific patterns of muscle recruitment. The network properties of this conceptual model can be simulated by a system of ordinary differential equations with a physiologically inspired coupling locus of interactions capturing the timing relationship for bilateral coordination of limbs in locomotion. Whereas most similar models are solved numerically, it is intriguing to have a full analytical description of this plausible CPG architecture to illuminate the functionality within this structure and to expand it to include steering control. Here, we provided a closed-form analytical solution contrasted against the previous numerical method. The evaluation time of the analytical solution was decreased by an order of magnitude when compared with the numerical approach (relative errors, <0.01%). The analytical solution tested and supported the previous finding that the input to the model can be expressed in units of the desired limb locomotor speed. Furthermore, we performed parametric sensitivity analysis in the context of controlling steering and documented two possible mechanisms associated with either an external drive or intrinsic CPG parameters. The results identify specific propriospinal pathways that may be associated with adaptations within the CPG structure. The model offered several network configurations that may generate the same behavioral outcomes. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using a simple process of leaky integration, we developed an analytical solution to a robust model of spinal pattern generation. We analyzed the ability of this neural element to exert locomotor control of the signal associated with limb speeds and tested the ability of this simple structure to embed steering control using the velocity signal in the model's inputs or within the internal connectivity of its elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.